Geneviève Van Maele-Fabry1, Sophie Duhayon, Dominique Lison. 1. Unité de Toxicologie Industrielle et Médecine du travail, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier 53, bte 5302, Brussels, 1200, Belgium. genevieve.vanmaele@toxi.ucl.ac.be
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analyses of published studies examining the association between myeloid leukemias (ML) and occupational pesticide exposure. METHODS: Studies were identified from a MEDLINE search through 31 May 2006 and from the reference lists of identified publications. Studies were summarized and evaluated for publication bias. Relative risk estimates for ML were extracted from 17 cohort and 16 case-control studies published between 1979 and 2005. Fixed- or random-effect meta-analysis models were used depending on the presence of heterogeneity between studies. Separate analyses were conducted after stratification for study design, occupational group, ML subtype or gender. RESULTS: The overall meta-rate ratio estimate (meta-RR) for the cohort studies was 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.48). Substantial heterogeneity existed among cohort studies (p=1.064 x 10(-5)), mainly reflecting the varying occupational categories examined. The meta-RR was 6.32 (95% CI: 1.90-21.01) for manufacturing workers and 2.14 (95% CI: 1.39-3.31) for pesticide applicators. After stratification of cohort studies by specific ML subtype, an increased risk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was found (meta-RR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.02-2.34). No significant heterogeneity was detected among case-control studies and an increased risk of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) was found among men (meta-RR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.03-1.88) and farmers or agricultural workers (meta-RR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.06-1.79). CONCLUSION: The strongest evidence of an increased risk of ML comes from manufacturing workers and pesticide applicators. Further studies will be needed to correlate reliable exposure data within these specific occupational groups with well-defined subtypes of leukemia to refine this assessment.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analyses of published studies examining the association between myeloid leukemias (ML) and occupational pesticide exposure. METHODS: Studies were identified from a MEDLINE search through 31 May 2006 and from the reference lists of identified publications. Studies were summarized and evaluated for publication bias. Relative risk estimates for ML were extracted from 17 cohort and 16 case-control studies published between 1979 and 2005. Fixed- or random-effect meta-analysis models were used depending on the presence of heterogeneity between studies. Separate analyses were conducted after stratification for study design, occupational group, ML subtype or gender. RESULTS: The overall meta-rate ratio estimate (meta-RR) for the cohort studies was 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.48). Substantial heterogeneity existed among cohort studies (p=1.064 x 10(-5)), mainly reflecting the varying occupational categories examined. The meta-RR was 6.32 (95% CI: 1.90-21.01) for manufacturing workers and 2.14 (95% CI: 1.39-3.31) for pesticide applicators. After stratification of cohort studies by specific ML subtype, an increased risk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was found (meta-RR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.02-2.34). No significant heterogeneity was detected among case-control studies and an increased risk of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) was found among men (meta-RR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.03-1.88) and farmers or agricultural workers (meta-RR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.06-1.79). CONCLUSION: The strongest evidence of an increased risk of ML comes from manufacturing workers and pesticide applicators. Further studies will be needed to correlate reliable exposure data within these specific occupational groups with well-defined subtypes of leukemia to refine this assessment.
Authors: Catherine C Lerro; Stella Koutros; Gabriella Andreotti; Dale P Sandler; Charles F Lynch; Lydia M Louis; Aaron Blair; Christine G Parks; Srishti Shrestha; Jay H Lubin; Paul S Albert; Jonathan N Hofmann; Laura E Beane Freeman Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Gabriella Andreotti; Stella Koutros; Jonathan N Hofmann; Dale P Sandler; Jay H Lubin; Charles F Lynch; Catherine C Lerro; Anneclaire J De Roos; Christine G Parks; Michael C Alavanja; Debra T Silverman; Laura E Beane Freeman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Jenna K Waggoner; Greg J Kullman; Paul K Henneberger; David M Umbach; Aaron Blair; Michael C R Alavanja; Freya Kamel; Charles F Lynch; Charles Knott; Stephanie J London; Cynthia J Hines; Kent W Thomas; Dale P Sandler; Jay H Lubin; Laura E Beane Freeman; Jane A Hoppin Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Rebecca J Tsai; Sara E Luckhaupt; Pam Schumacher; Rosemary D Cress; Dennis M Deapen; Geoffrey M Calvert Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2014-03-31
Authors: Rena R Jones; Chu-Ling Yu; John R Nuckols; James R Cerhan; Matthew Airola; Julie A Ross; Kim Robien; Mary H Ward Journal: Environ Res Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 6.498