Literature DB >> 17443208

Amphetamine increases blood pressure and heart rate but has no effect on motor recovery or cerebral haemodynamics in ischaemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN 36285333).

N Sprigg1, M R Willmot, L J Gray, A Sunderland, V Pomeroy, M Walker, P M W Bath.   

Abstract

Amphetamine enhances recovery after experimental ischaemia and has shown promise in small clinical trials when combined with motor or sensory stimulation. Amphetamine, a sympathomimetic, might have haemodynamic effects in stroke patients, although limited data have been published. Subjects were recruited 3-30 days post-ischaemic stroke into a phase II randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects received dexamphetamine (5 mg initially, then 10 mg for 10 subsequent doses with 3- or 4-day separations) or placebo in addition to inpatient physiotherapy. Recovery was assessed by motor scales (Fugl-Meyer (FM)), and functional scales (Barthel index (BI) and modified Rankin score (mRS)). Peripheral blood pressure (BP), central haemodynamics and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity were assessed before, and 90 min after, the first two doses. Thirty-three subjects were recruited, aged 33-88 (mean 71) years, males 52%, 4-30 (median 15) days post stroke to inclusion. Sixteen patients were randomized to placebo and seventeen to amphetamine. Amphetamine did not improve motor function at 90 days; mean (s.d.) FM 37.6 (27.6) vs control 35.2 (27.8) (P=0.81). Functional outcome (BI, mRS) did not differ between treatment groups. Peripheral and central systolic BP, and heart rate (HR), were 11.2 mm Hg (P=0.03), 9.5 mm Hg (P=0.04) and 7 beats per minute (P=0.02) higher, respectively, with amphetamine, compared with control. A nonsignificant reduction in myocardial perfusion (BUI) was seen with amphetamine. Other cardiac and cerebral haemodynamics were unaffected. Amphetamine did not improve motor impairment or function after ischaemic stroke but did significantly increase BP and HR without altering cerebral haemodynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17443208     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  10 in total

1.  Investigation of the mechanisms mediating MDMA "Ecstasy"-induced increases in cerebro-cortical perfusion determined by btASL MRI.

Authors:  J Rouine; M E Kelly; C Jennings-Murphy; P Duffy; I Gorman; S Gormley; C M Kerskens; Andrew Harkin
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Effects of Central Nervous System Drugs on Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  See-Hwee Yeo; Zheng-Jie Ian Lim; Jia Mao; Wai-Ping Yau
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 3.  Vasoactive drugs for acute stroke.

Authors:  Chamila Geeganage; Philip Mw Bath
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-07-07

Review 4.  Central Noradrenergic Agonists in the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke-an Overview.

Authors:  Zohi Sternberg; B Schaller
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 5.  Obesity Management in Cardiometabolic Disease: State of the Art.

Authors:  Sean J Iwamoto; Layla A Abushamat; Adnin Zaman; Anthony J Millard; Marc-Andre Cornier
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Secondary hypertension: interfering substances.

Authors:  Ehud Grossman; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 7.  Blood pressure management in acute stroke.

Authors:  Jason P Appleton; Nikola Sprigg; Philip M Bath
Journal:  Stroke Vasc Neurol       Date:  2016-06-24

Review 8.  Neurotechnology-aided interventions for upper limb motor rehabilitation in severe chronic stroke.

Authors:  Martina Coscia; Maximilian J Wessel; Ujwal Chaudary; José Del R Millán; Silvestro Micera; Adrian Guggisberg; Philippe Vuadens; John Donoghue; Niels Birbaumer; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Trends in characteristics of the recipients of new prescription stimulants between years 2010 and 2020 in the United States: An observational cohort study.

Authors:  Shannon Brumbaugh; Wen Jan Tuan; Alyssa Scott; James R Latronica; Curtis Bone
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 10.  Translating the frontiers of brain repair to treatments: starting not to break the rules.

Authors:  S Thomas Carmichael
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 7.046

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.