Literature DB >> 17442821

Independent effects of emotion and working memory load on visual activation in the lateral occipital complex.

Jan Gläscher1, Michael Rose, Christian Büchel.   

Abstract

Emotional salience and working memory (WM) load are known to affect object processing in the ventral stream. However, the combined effect, which could be either synergistic or antagonistic, remains unclear. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging and a three-factorial design, we investigated the effects of WM load and emotional salience on object processing in the ventral visual stream. Twenty-three female subjects were shown blocks of task-irrelevant and more or less degraded visual stimuli that varied in emotional valence (negative or neutral) and phase coherence rendering them more or less noisy. Superimposed on these pictures, subjects saw colored squares on which they had to perform a demanding WM task (one-back, two-back). This WM task absorbs attentional resources normally available for the perceptual analysis of visual objects and can therefore be interpreted as a manipulation of attention. We hypothesized that attenuated processing resources in the lateral occipital complex (LOC) for these task-irrelevant pictures under high WM load (Rose et al., 2005) could be regained when they were of negative emotional valence. Our results indicate that both emotional salience and WM load critically depend on a minimum level of phase coherence of the stimuli to affect LOC activation. Furthermore, the influences of emotional salience and WM load do not interact with each other in LOC. Rather, emotional salience exerts a general multiplicative gain effect while preserving the difference in activation between low and high WM load. A connectivity analysis suggests that the emotional modulation might originate in the amygdalo-hippocampal junction.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17442821      PMCID: PMC6672316          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3310-06.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  8 in total

1.  Visualization of group inference data in functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  Jan Gläscher
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2009-01-13

2.  Modulation of working memory load distinguishes individuals with and without balance impairments following mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Woytowicz; Chandler Sours; Rao P Gullapalli; Joseph Rosenberg; Kelly P Westlake
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Diurnal cortisol amplitude and fronto-limbic activity in response to stressful stimuli.

Authors:  Amy C Cunningham-Bussel; James C Root; Tracy Butler; Oliver Tuescher; Hong Pan; Jane Epstein; Daniel S Weisholtz; Michelle Pavony; Michael E Silverman; Martin S Goldstein; Margaret Altemus; Marylene Cloitre; Joseph Ledoux; Bruce McEwen; Emily Stern; David Silbersweig
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.905

4.  Single-trial discrimination for integrating simultaneous EEG and fMRI: identifying cortical areas contributing to trial-to-trial variability in the auditory oddball task.

Authors:  Robin I Goldman; Cheng-Yu Wei; Marios G Philiastides; Adam D Gerson; David Friedman; Truman R Brown; Paul Sajda
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The effect of threat on novelty evoked amygdala responses.

Authors:  Nicholas L Balderston; Doug H Schultz; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  EEG and autonomic responses during performance of matching and non-matching to sample working memory tasks with emotional content.

Authors:  Ana Garcia; Carlos Enrique Uribe; Maria Clotilde H Tavares; Carlos Tomaz
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Selective attention to task-irrelevant emotional distractors is unaffected by the perceptual load associated with a foreground task.

Authors:  Catherine Hindi Attar; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The impact of affective information on working memory: A pair of meta-analytic reviews of behavioral and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  Susanne Schweizer; Ajay B Satpute; Shir Atzil; Andy P Field; Caitlin Hitchcock; Melissa Black; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Tim Dalgleish
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 17.737

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.