Literature DB >> 1744230

[Innervation of the sacroiliac joint. Macroscopical and histological studies].

R Ikeda1.   

Abstract

Macroscopical and histological studies were carried out to clarify nerve innervation of the sacroiliac joint which is believed to have a role in the development of low back pain. Eighteen Japanese adult cadavers were used for gross anatomical examination and six for histological examination of the nerve supply to the joint. The results were as follows: 1) It is suggested by the gross examination that the upper ventral portion of the joint is mainly innervated by the ventral ramus of the 5th lumber nerve. 2) The lower ventral portion of the joint was mainly supplied by the ramus of the 2nd sacral nerve or branches from the sacral plexus. 3) Lateral branches of the dorsal ramus of the 5th lumber nerve were considered to be the main nerves which innervated the upper dorsal portion of the joint. 4) The lower dorsal portion was innervated by nerves arising from a plexus composed of lateral branches of the dorsal rami of the sacral nerves. 5) The nerves which innervate the joint range in diameter from 0.292 mm to 0.997 mm, and no difference was found among those in the four subdivisions of the joint. 6) Histological examination revealed that nerve fibers and the terminals were present in the joint capsule and adjoining ligaments. The nerve fibers varied from 0.2 micron to 2.5 microns in diameter and ended with five morphologically different terminals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1744230     DOI: 10.1272/jnms1923.58.587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nihon Ika Daigaku Zasshi        ISSN: 0048-0444


  10 in total

1.  Lateral branches of dorsal sacral nerve plexus and the long posterior sacroiliac ligament.

Authors:  M C McGrath; M Zhang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Percutaneous Sacroiliac Joint Fixation in Sacroiliac Instability. The First Case Report Using a Fully CT-Guided Technique.

Authors:  Luigi Manfré
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

Review 4.  The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications.

Authors:  A Vleeming; M D Schuenke; A T Masi; J E Carreiro; L Danneels; F H Willard
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  'Simplicity' radiofrequency neurotomy of sacroiliac joint: a real life 1-year follow-up UK data.

Authors:  Vinay S Anjana Reddy; Chhaya Sharma; Kuang-Yi Chang; Vivek Mehta
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2016-02-09

Review 6.  Comprehensive anatomical and immunohistochemical review of the innervation of the human spine and joints with application to an improved understanding of back pain.

Authors:  Pamela Youssef; Marios Loukas; Jens R Chapman; Rod J Oskouian; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of the painful sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  Mark Laslett
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

8.  Ablation of the sacroiliac joint using MR-guided high intensity focused ultrasound: a preliminary experiment in a swine model.

Authors:  Elena A Kaye; Majid Maybody; Sebastien Monette; Stephen B Solomon; Amitabh Gulati
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2017-06-26

9.  Accuracy of the Diagnostic Tests of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

Authors:  Parisa Nejati; Elham Sartaj; Farnad Imani; Reza Moeineddin; Lida Nejati; Marta Safavi
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2020-09-12

10.  Pelvic orthosis effects on posterior pelvis kinematics An in-vitro biomechanical study.

Authors:  Stefan Klima; Ronny Grunert; Benjamin Ondruschka; Mario Scholze; Thomas Seidel; Michael Werner; Niels Hammer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.