Literature DB >> 17441505

A pilot study with a therapeutic vaccine based on hydroxyapatite ceramic particles and self-antigens in cancer patients.

Daniel R Ciocca1, Patrick Frayssinet, F Darío Cuello-Carrión.   

Abstract

We describe an approach to produce an autologous therapeutic antitumor vaccine using hydroxyapatite (HA) for vaccinating cancer patients. The novel approach involved (1) the purification of part of the self-tumor antigens/ adjuvants using column chromatography with HA, (2) the employ of HA as a medium to attract antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to the vaccination site, and (3) the use of HA as a vector to present in vivo the tumor antigens and adjuvants to the patient's APCs. The vaccine was prepared using and combining HA particles, with at least 3 heat shock proteins (gp96 was one of them possibly with chaperoned proteins/peptides as shown in the slot blots) and with proteins from the cell membrane system (including Hsp70, Hsp27, and membrane proteins). The timing of HA degradation was tested in rats; the HA particles administered under the skin attracted macrophages and were degraded into smaller particles, and they were totally phagocytized within 1 week. In patients (n = 20), the vaccine was then administered weekly and showed very low toxicity, causing minor and tolerable local inflammation (erythema, papule, or local pain); only 1 patient who received a larger dose presented hot flashes, and there were no systemic manifestations of toxicity or autoimmune diseases attributed to the vaccine. Our study suggests that this therapeutic vaccine has shown some efficacy producing a positive response in certain patients. Stable disease was noted in 25% of the patients (renal carcinoma, breast carcinoma, and astrocytoma), and a partial response was noted in 15% of the patients (breast carcinoma and astrocytoma). The most encouraging results were seen in patients with recurrent disease; 4 patients in these conditions (20%) are disease free following the vaccine administration. However, we do not want to overstate the clinical efficacy in this small number of patients. The therapeutic vaccine tested in our study is working by activating the T-cell response as was shown in the comparative histological and immunohistochemical study performed in the pre- and postvaccine biopsy taken from a patient with inflammatory breast carcinoma. However, we cannot ruled out that the vaccine could also be producing an antibody(ies)-mediated response. In conclusion, this therapeutic vaccine based on HA ceramic particles and self-antigens can be safely administered and is showing some encouraging clinical results in cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17441505      PMCID: PMC1852891          DOI: 10.1379/csc-218r.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones        ISSN: 1355-8145            Impact factor:   3.667


  32 in total

1.  Cancer vaccines: pessimism in check.

Authors:  Simone Mocellin; Susanna Mandruzzato; Vincenzo Bronte; Francesco M Marincola
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Glycoprotein 96-activated dendritic cells induce a CD8-biased T cell response.

Authors:  Sabina Rayo Ramirez; Harpreet Singh-Jasuja; Tobias Warger; Sibylla Braedel-Ruoff; Norbert Hilf; Katrin Wiemann; Hans-Georg Rammensee; Hansjörg Schild
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 3.  Immunostimulatory colloidal delivery systems for cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Anne Saupe; Warren McBurney; Thomas Rades; Sarah Hook
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.648

Review 4.  Therapeutic vaccination in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. A review of immunological and clinical results.

Authors:  S Mosolits; G Ullenhag; H Mellstedt
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  The messenger and the message: gp96 (GRP94)-peptide interactions in cellular immunity.

Authors:  Christopher V Nicchitta; Deanna M Carrick; Julie C Baker-Lepain
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 6.  Molecular chaperones and cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  X Y Wang; J G Facciponte; J R Subjeck
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2006

Review 7.  Heat shock proteins in cancer: diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, and treatment implications.

Authors:  Daniel R Ciocca; Stuart K Calderwood
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 8.  Update on the role of interleukin 2 and other cytokines in the treatment of patients with stage IV renal carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael B Atkins; Meredith Regan; David McDermott
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Heat shock proteins in cancer: chaperones of tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Stuart K Calderwood; Md Abdul Khaleque; Douglas B Sawyer; Daniel R Ciocca
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 13.807

10.  Serological detection of heat shock protein hsp27 in normal and breast cancer patients.

Authors:  M A Fanelli; F D Cuello Carrión; J Dekker; J Schoemaker; D R Ciocca
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  The human HSP70 family of chaperones: where do we stand?

Authors:  Jürgen Radons
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 2.  Targeting Hsp70: A possible therapy for cancer.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; James Stokes; Udai P Singh; Karyn Scissum Gunn; Arbind Acharya; Upender Manne; Manoj Mishra
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 8.679

3.  Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome Complexes by Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Particles and Stimulation of Immune Cell Migration in vivo.

Authors:  Kouji Maruyama; Jin-Yan Cheng; Hidee Ishii; Yu Takahashi; Vincent Zangiacomi; Takatomo Satoh; Tetsuji Hosono; Ken Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Innate Immun       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 7.111

4.  Heat shock proteins as biomarkers of lung cancer.

Authors:  Sonam Mittal; Maitreyi S Rajala
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 5.  Immune precision medicine for cancer: a novel insight based on the efficiency of immune effector cells.

Authors:  Jean-François Rossi; Patrice Céballos; Zhao-Yang Lu
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2019-06-14

Review 6.  The Importance of the Tumor Microenvironment and Hypoxia in Delivering a Precision Medicine Approach to Veterinary Oncology.

Authors:  Mark Gray; James Meehan; Arran K Turnbull; Carlos Martínez-Pérez; Charlene Kay; Lisa Y Pang; David J Argyle
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-11-12

7.  Trial watch: Peptide vaccines in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Erika Vacchelli; Isabelle Martins; Alexander Eggermont; Wolf Hervé Fridman; Jerome Galon; Catherine Sautès-Fridman; Eric Tartour; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 8.110

8.  A phase I study on combined therapy with proton-beam radiotherapy and in situ tumor vaccination for locally advanced recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Masato Abei; Toshiyuki Okumura; Kuniaki Fukuda; Takayuki Hashimoto; Masahiro Araki; Kazunori Ishige; Ichinosuke Hyodo; Ayae Kanemoto; Haruko Numajiri; Masashi Mizumoto; Takeji Sakae; Hideyuki Sakurai; Junko Zenkoh; Gerelchuluun Ariungerel; Yu Sogo; Atsuo Ito; Tadao Ohno; Koji Tsuboi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 9.  Pathology-dependent effects linked to small heat shock proteins expression: an update.

Authors:  A-P Arrigo
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2012-10-09

10.  2-phenylethynesulfonamide inhibits growth of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells by blocking the function of heat shock protein 70.

Authors:  Liang Jiang; Jing Xiao
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.