BACKGROUND: Although paclitaxel is used for hormone-resistant prostate cancer, relapse definitely occurs later. Details of the molecular mechanism responsible for paclitaxel- resistance remain unclear. METHODS: We established paclitaxel-resistant cells, DU145-TxR and PC-3-TxR from parent DU145 and PC-3. To characterize these cells, we examined cross-resistance to other anticancer drugs. Expression of several potential genes that had been related to drug-resistance was compared with parent cells by RT-PCR and Western blotting. Methylation analysis of multiple drug resistance (MDR1) promoter was carried out using bisulfite-modified DNA from cell lines. Knockdown experiments using small interfering RNA (siRNA) were also performed to confirm responsibility of drug-resistance. Finally, cDNA microarray was performed to quantify gene expression in PC-3 and PC-3-TxR cells. RESULTS: The IC(50) for paclitaxel in DU145-TxR and PC-3-TxR was 34.0- and 43.4-fold higher than that in both parent cells, respectively. Both cells showed cross-resistance to some drugs, but not to VP-16 and cisplatin. Methylation analysis revealed that methylated CpG sites of MDR1 promoter in DU145 and PC-3 cells were demethylated in DU145-TxR cells, but not in PC-3-TxR cells. Knockdown of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), which was up-regulated in resistant cells, by MDR-1 siRNA restored paclitaxel sensitivity in DU145-TxR but not in PC-3-TxR, indicating that up-regulation of P-gp was not always main cause of paclitaxel-resistance. Microarray analysis identified 201 (1.34%) up-regulated genes and 218 (1.45%) out of screened genes in PC-3-TxR. CONCLUSIONS: Our data will provide molecular mechanisms of paclitaxel-resistance and be useful for screening target genes to diagnose paclitaxel sensitivity.
BACKGROUND: Although paclitaxel is used for hormone-resistant prostate cancer, relapse definitely occurs later. Details of the molecular mechanism responsible for paclitaxel- resistance remain unclear. METHODS: We established paclitaxel-resistant cells, DU145-TxR and PC-3-TxR from parent DU145 and PC-3. To characterize these cells, we examined cross-resistance to other anticancer drugs. Expression of several potential genes that had been related to drug-resistance was compared with parent cells by RT-PCR and Western blotting. Methylation analysis of multiple drug resistance (MDR1) promoter was carried out using bisulfite-modified DNA from cell lines. Knockdown experiments using small interfering RNA (siRNA) were also performed to confirm responsibility of drug-resistance. Finally, cDNA microarray was performed to quantify gene expression in PC-3 and PC-3-TxR cells. RESULTS: The IC(50) for paclitaxel in DU145-TxR and PC-3-TxR was 34.0- and 43.4-fold higher than that in both parent cells, respectively. Both cells showed cross-resistance to some drugs, but not to VP-16 and cisplatin. Methylation analysis revealed that methylated CpG sites of MDR1 promoter in DU145 and PC-3 cells were demethylated in DU145-TxR cells, but not in PC-3-TxR cells. Knockdown of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), which was up-regulated in resistant cells, by MDR-1 siRNA restored paclitaxel sensitivity in DU145-TxR but not in PC-3-TxR, indicating that up-regulation of P-gp was not always main cause of paclitaxel-resistance. Microarray analysis identified 201 (1.34%) up-regulated genes and 218 (1.45%) out of screened genes in PC-3-TxR. CONCLUSIONS: Our data will provide molecular mechanisms of paclitaxel-resistance and be useful for screening target genes to diagnose paclitaxel sensitivity.
Authors: Mi Zhang; Mary Osisami; Jinlu Dai; Jill M Keller; June Escara-Wilke; Atsushi Mizokami; Evan T Keller Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Byoung Heon Kang; Markus D Siegelin; Janet Plescia; Christopher M Raskett; David S Garlick; Takehiko Dohi; Jane B Lian; Gary S Stein; Lucia R Languino; Dario C Altieri Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Joshua J Souchek; Amanda L Davis; Tanner K Hill; Megan B Holmes; Bowen Qi; Pankaj K Singh; Steven J Kridel; Aaron M Mohs Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Souvik Banerjee; Kinsie E Arnst; Yuxi Wang; Gyanendra Kumar; Shanshan Deng; Lei Yang; Guo-Bo Li; Jinliang Yang; Stephen W White; Wei Li; Duane D Miller Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2018-02-12 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Justin Q Wang; Austin DeChalus; Devin N Chatterjee; Evan T Keller; Atsushi Mizokami; Giovanni Camussi; Andrew R Mendelsohn; Joseph F Renzulli Ii; Peter J Quesenberry; Devasis Chatterjee Journal: Crit Rev Oncog Date: 2015
Authors: Amanda Obaidat; Jeffrey Weiss; Brett Wahlgren; Rama R Manam; Venkat R Macherla; Katherine McArthur; Ta-Hsiang Chao; Michael A Palladino; G Kenneth Lloyd; Barbara C Potts; Salvatore J Enna; Saskia T C Neuteboom; Bruno Hagenbuch Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2011-02-08 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: John G Wise; Amila K Nanayakkara; Maha Aljowni; Gang Chen; Maisa C De Oliveira; Lauren Ammerman; Ketetha Olengue; Alexander R Lippert; Pia D Vogel Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Dannah R Miller; Cherng-Chyi Tzeng; Trey Farmer; Evan T Keller; Steve Caplan; Yu-Shuin Chen; Yeh-Long Chen; Ming-Fong Lin Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Amanda L Cleaver; Alex H Beesley; Martin J Firth; Nina C Sturges; Rebecca A O'Leary; Stephen P Hunger; David L Baker; Ursula R Kees Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2010-05-12 Impact factor: 27.401