Literature DB >> 17440486

Exposure to fine particles (PM2.5 and PM1) and black smoke in the general population: personal, indoor, and outdoor levels.

Sandra Johannesson1, Pernilla Gustafson, Peter Molnár, Lars Barregard, Gerd Sällsten.   

Abstract

Personal exposure to PM(2.5) and PM(1), together with indoor and residential outdoor levels, was measured in the general adult population (30 subjects, 23-51 years of age) of Gothenburg, Sweden. Simultaneously, urban background concentrations of PM(2.5) were monitored with an EPA WINS impactor. The 24-h samples were gravimetrically analyzed for mass concentration and black smoke (BS) using a smokestain reflectometer. Median levels of PM(2.5) were 8.4 microg/m(3) (personal), 8.6 microg/m(3) (indoor), 6.4 microg/m(3) (residential outdoor), and 5.6 microg/m(3) (urban background). Personal exposure to PM(1) was 5.4 microg/m(3), while PM(1) indoor and outdoor levels were 6.2 and 5.2 microg/m(3), respectively. In non-smokers, personal exposure to PM(2.5) was significantly higher than were residential outdoor levels. BS absorption coefficients were fairly similar for all microenvironments (0.4-0.5 10(-5) m(-1)). Personal exposure to particulate matter (PM) and BS was well correlated with indoor levels, and there was an acceptable agreement between personal exposure and urban background concentrations for PM(2.5) and BS(2.5) (r(s)=0.61 and 0.65, respectively). PM(1) made up a considerable amount (70-80%) of PM(2.5) in all microenvironments. Levels of BS were higher outdoors than indoors and higher during the fall compared with spring. The correlations between particle mass and BS for both PM(2.5) vs. BS(2.5) and PM(1) versus BS(1) were weak for all microenvironments including personal exposure. The urban background station provided a good estimate of residential outdoor levels of PM(2.5) and BS(2.5) within the city (r(s)=0.90 and 0.77, respectively). Outdoor levels were considerably affected by long-range transported air pollution, which was not found for personal exposure or indoor levels. The within-individual (day-to-day) variability dominated for personal exposure to both PM(2.5) and BS(2.5) in non-smokers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17440486     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  13 in total

1.  Changes to indoor air quality as a result of relocating families from slums to public housing.

Authors:  Soledad Burgos; Pablo Ruiz; Rosalina Koifman
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Participatory testing and reporting in an environmental-justice community of Worcester, Massachusetts: a pilot project.

Authors:  Timothy J Downs; Laurie Ross; Danielle Mucciarone; Maria-Camila Calvache; Octavia Taylor; Robert Goble
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 5.984

3.  Examining the representativeness of home outdoor PM(2.5), EC, and OC estimates for daily personal exposures in Southern California.

Authors:  Regina E Ducret-Stich; Ralph J Delfino; Thomas Tjoa; Armin Gemperli; Alex Ineichen; Jun Wu; Harish C Phuleria; L-J Sally Liu
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.763

4.  Regression models for log-normal data: comparing different methods for quantifying the association between abdominal adiposity and biomarkers of inflammation and insulin resistance.

Authors:  Sara Gustavsson; Björn Fagerberg; Gerd Sallsten; Eva M Andersson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The effect of secondary inorganic aerosols, soot and the geographical origin of air mass on acute myocardial infarction hospitalisations in Gothenburg, Sweden during 1985-2010: a case-crossover study.

Authors:  Janine Wichmann; Karin Sjöberg; Lin Tang; Marie Haeger-Eugensson; Annika Rosengren; Eva M Andersson; Lars Barregard; Gerd Sallsten
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  A chronology of ratios between black smoke and PM10 and PM2.5 in the context of comparison of air pollution epidemiology concentration-response functions.

Authors:  Mathew R Heal; Iain J Beverland
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Assessment of Traffic-Related Air Pollution: Case Study of Pregnant Women in South Texas.

Authors:  Mohammad Hashem Askariyeh; Suriya Vallamsundar; Josias Zietsman; Tara Ramani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Health effects of residential wood smoke particles: the importance of combustion conditions and physicochemical particle properties.

Authors:  Anette Kocbach Bølling; Joakim Pagels; Karl Espen Yttri; Lars Barregard; Gerd Sallsten; Per E Schwarze; Christoffer Boman
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 9.400

9.  An indoor air filtration study in homes of elderly: cardiovascular and respiratory effects of exposure to particulate matter.

Authors:  Dorina Gabriela Karottki; Michal Spilak; Marie Frederiksen; Lars Gunnarsen; Elvira Vaclavik Brauner; Barbara Kolarik; Zorana Jovanovic Andersen; Torben Sigsgaard; Lars Barregard; Bo Strandberg; Gerd Sallsten; Peter Møller; Steffen Loft
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 10.  Spatial and Temporal Dynamics in Air Pollution Exposure Assessment.

Authors:  Daniela Dias; Oxana Tchepel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.