Literature DB >> 17440145

Clinical response and risk for reported suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in pediatric antidepressant treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Jeffrey A Bridge1, Satish Iyengar, Cheryl B Salary, Rémy P Barbe, Boris Birmaher, Harold Alan Pincus, Lulu Ren, David A Brent.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued warnings that use of antidepressant medications poses a small but significantly increased risk of suicidal ideation/suicide attempt for children and adolescents.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and risk of reported suicidal ideation/suicide attempt of antidepressants for treatment of pediatric major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and non-OCD anxiety disorders. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: PubMed (1988 to July 2006), relevant US and British regulatory agency reports, published abstracts of important scientific meetings (1998-2006), clinical trial registries, and information from authors. Studies were published and unpublished randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials of second-generation antidepressants (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, nefazodone, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine) in participants younger than 19 years with MDD, OCD, or non-OCD anxiety disorders. DATA EXTRACTION: Information was extracted on study characteristics, efficacy outcomes, and spontaneously reported suicidal ideation/suicide attempt. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-seven trials of pediatric MDD (n = 15), OCD (n = 6), and non-OCD anxiety disorders (n = 6) were selected, and risk differences for response and for suicidal ideation/suicide attempt estimated by random-effects methods. Pooled risk differences in rates of primary study-defined measures of responder status significantly favored antidepressants for MDD (11.0%; [95% confidence interval {CI}, 7.1% to 14.9%]), OCD (19.8% [95% CI, 13.0% to 26.6%), and non-OCD anxiety disorders (37.1% [22.5% to 51.7%]), corresponding to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 10 (95% CI, 7 to 15), 6 (4 to 8), and 3 (2 to 5), respectively. While there was increased risk difference of suicidal ideation/suicide attempt across all trials and indications for drug vs placebo (0.7%; 95% CI, 0.1% to 1.3%) (number needed to harm, 143 [95% CI, 77 to 1000]), the pooled risk differences within each indication were not statistically significant: 0.9% (95% CI, -0.1% to 1.9%) for MDD, 0.5% (-1.2% to 2.2%) for OCD, and 0.7% (-0.4% to 1.8%) for non-OCD anxiety disorders. There were no completed suicides. Age-stratified analyses showed that for children younger than 12 years with MDD, only fluoxetine showed benefit over placebo. In MDD trials, efficacy was moderated by age, duration of depression, and number of sites in the treatment trial.
CONCLUSIONS: Relative to placebo, antidepressants are efficacious for pediatric MDD, OCD, and non-OCD anxiety disorders, although the effects are strongest in non-OCD anxiety disorders, intermediate in OCD, and more modest in MDD. Benefits of antidepressants appear to be much greater than risks from suicidal ideation/suicide attempt across indications, although comparison of benefit to risk varies as a function of indication, age, chronicity, and study conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17440145     DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.15.1683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  248 in total

Review 1.  Child and adolescent psychiatry: past scientific achievements and challenges for the future.

Authors:  Michael Rutter
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 2.  Childhood internalizing behaviour: analysis and implications.

Authors:  J Liu; X Chen; G Lewis
Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.952

Review 3.  Strategies for quantifying the relationship between medications and suicidal behaviour: what has been learned?

Authors:  Robert D Gibbons; J John Mann
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Pharmacokinetically and clinician-determined adherence to an antidepressant regimen and clinical outcome in the TORDIA trial.

Authors:  Hiwot Woldu; Giovanna Porta; Tina Goldstein; Dara Sakolsky; James Perel; Graham Emslie; Taryn Mayes; Greg Clarke; Neal D Ryan; Boris Birmaher; Karen Dineen Wagner; Joan Rosenbaum Asarnow; Martin B Keller; David Brent
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 8.829

Review 5.  Generalised anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Christopher K Gale; Jane Millichamp
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-10-27

6.  Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Treatment-Emergent Activation and Suicidality Assessment Profile.

Authors:  Jeannette M Reid; Eric A Storch; Tanya K Murphy; Danielle Bodzin; P Jane Mutch; Heather Lehmkuhl; Michael Aman; Wayne K Goodman
Journal:  Child Youth Care Forum       Date:  2010-02-04

Review 7.  Obsessive compulsive disorder.

Authors:  G Mustafa Soomro
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2012-01-18

8.  Emerging Pharmacologic Treatments for Adolescent Substance Use: Challenges and New Directions.

Authors:  Robert Miranda; Hayley Treloar
Journal:  Curr Addict Rep       Date:  2016-04-02

Review 9.  Developmental rodent models of fear and anxiety: from neurobiology to pharmacology.

Authors:  Despina E Ganella; Jee Hyun Kim
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 10.  Evidence for the management of adolescent depression.

Authors:  R Eric Lewandowski; Mary C Acri; Kimberly E Hoagwood; Mark Olfson; Greg Clarke; William Gardner; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Sepheen Byron; Kelly Kelleher; Harold A Pincus; Samantha Frank; Sarah M Horwitz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.