Literature DB >> 17439831

A new automated screening assay for the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease.

Raneem O Salem1, Elizabeth M Van Cott.   

Abstract

A new, automated assay for von Willebrand factor (vWF) activity has recently become commercially available (HemosIL vWF activity assay, Instrumentation Laboratories, Lexington, MA). We prospectively studied 61 specimens from 58 patients undergoing laboratory testing for suspicion of von Willebrand disease with this new method, in comparison with the established ristocetin cofactor method. Assays for factor VIII and vWF antigen were also performed using an established method on an MDA-180 coagulation analyzer (bioMérieux, Durham, NC) and a new method on an ACL TOP coagulation analyzer (Instrumentation Laboratories). Blood types were determined. The results showed no significant difference between the assays for factor VIII (mean, 97% for MDA-180 and ACL TOP; P = .494) or vWF antigen (mean, MDA-180, 109%; ACL TOP, 111%; P = .766). The mean result for the ristocetin cofactor assay was 106% vs 93% with the automated vWF activity (P = .007). The automated activity assay was 100% sensitive and 86% specific for detecting vWF abnormalities and seems to be a suitable screening test. Abnormal results should be followed up with a ristocetin cofactor activity assay for confirmation. Further study is recommended to confirm these conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17439831     DOI: 10.1309/CEPND3LFHQ87XU4D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  7 in total

1.  The application of vWF/ADAMTS13 in essential hypertension.

Authors:  Wei-Hong Ma; Lin Sheng; Hui-Ping Gong; Lin-Lin Guo; Qing-Hua Lu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

Review 2.  Laboratory testing for von Willebrand disease: toward a mechanism-based classification.

Authors:  Richard Torres; Yuri Fedoriw
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.935

Review 3.  Platelet-dependent von Willebrand factor activity. Nomenclature and methodology: communication from the SSC of the ISTH.

Authors:  I Bodó; J Eikenboom; R Montgomery; J Patzke; R Schneppenheim; J Di Paola
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  Comparison of von Willebrand factor platelet-binding activity assays: ELISA overreads type 2B with loss of HMW multimers.

Authors:  Attila Szederjesi; Luciano Baronciani; Ulrich Budde; Giancarlo Castaman; Paola Colpani; Andrew S Lawrie; Yuan Liu; Robert Montgomery; Flora Peyvandi; Reinhard Schneppenheim; Jürgen Patzke; Imre Bodó
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.824

5.  An international collaborative study to compare different von Willebrand factor glycoprotein Ib binding activity assays: the COMPASS-VWF study.

Authors:  A Szederjesi; L Baronciani; U Budde; G Castaman; A S Lawrie; Y Liu; R Montgomery; F Peyvandi; R Schneppenheim; A Várkonyi; J Patzke; I Bodó
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.824

6.  A Comparative Evaluation of an Automated Functional Assay for Von Willebrand Factor Activity in Type 1 Von Willebrand Disease.

Authors:  Shiue-Wei Lai; Chia-Yau Chang; Shin-Nan Cheng; Shu-Hsia Hu; Chung-Yu Lai; Yeu-Chin Chen
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-09-02

Review 7.  Current issues in diagnosis and treatment of von Willebrand disease.

Authors:  Daniel A Keesler; Veronica H Flood
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2017-12-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.