Literature DB >> 17439714

Clinical limitations of Invisalign.

Xiem Phan1, Paul H Ling.   

Abstract

Adult patients seeking orthodontic treatment are increasingly motivated by esthetic considerations. The majority of these patients reject wearing labial fixed appliances and are looking instead to more esthetic treatment options, including lingual orthodontics and Invisalign appliances. Since Align Technology introduced the Invisalign appliance in 1999 in an extensive public campaign, the appliance has gained tremendous attention from adult patients and dental professionals. The transparency of the Invisalign appliance enhances its esthetic appeal for those adult patients who are averse to wearing conventional labial fixed orthodontic appliances. Although guidelines about the types of malocclusions that this technique can treat exist, few clinical studies have assessed the effectiveness of the appliance. A few recent studies have outlined some of the limitations associated with this technique that clinicians should recognize early before choosing treatment options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17439714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0709-8936            Impact factor:   1.316


  15 in total

1.  Correction of palatally displaced maxillary lateral incisors without brackets.

Authors:  Kyung-Hee Choi; Yoonjung Lee; Minji Kim; Youn-Sic Chun
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Comparison of Short-Term Oral Impacts Experienced by Patients Treated with Invisalign or Conventional Fixed Orthodontic Appliances.

Authors:  Saitah Alajmi; Arwa Shaban; Rashed Al-Azemi
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Patient survey on Invisalign® treatment comparing [corrected] the SmartTrack® material to the previously used [corrected] aligner material.

Authors:  Anne-Kathrin Bräscher; Dietmar Zuran; Robert E Feldmann; Justus Benrath
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 4.  Clinical effectiveness of clear aligner treatment compared to fixed appliance treatment: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Yassir A Yassir; Sarah A Nabbat; Grant T McIntyre; David R Bearn
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Aligners, Environmental Contamination, and The Role of Orthodontics.

Authors:  Maria Perpétua Mota Freitas
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Speech performance in adult patients undergoing Invisalign treatment.

Authors:  Erin Corsi Fraundorf; Eustáquio Araújo; Hiroshi Ueno; Patricia Pigato Schneider; Ki Beom Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Three-dimensional digital planning of class III decompensation with clear aligners: Hard and soft tissue augmentation with concomitant corticotomy to stretch the limits of safe orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Federico Brugnami; Simonetta Meuli; Alfonso Caiazzo; Sergio Marrocco; Domenico Scopelliti
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-02-25

8.  Orthodontic treatment of a mandibular incisor extraction case with invisalign.

Authors:  Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2014-06-12

9.  Recommendations for clear aligner therapy using digital or plaster study casts.

Authors:  Hsiu-Ching Ko; Weitao Liu; Derek Hou; Sepideh Torkan; Charles Spiekerman; Greg J Huang
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  A comparison of treatment effectiveness between clear aligner and fixed appliance therapies.

Authors:  Yunyan Ke; Yanfei Zhu; Min Zhu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.