Literature DB >> 17439619

Lineages with long durations are old and morphologically average: an analysis using multiple datasets.

Lee Hsiang Liow1.   

Abstract

Lineage persistence is as central to biology as evolutionary change. Important questions regarding persistence include: why do some lineages outlive their relatives, neither becoming extinct nor evolving into separate lineages? Do these long-duration lineages have distinctive ecological or morphological traits that correlate with their geologic durations and potentially aid their survival? In this paper, I test the hypothesis that lineages (species and higher taxa) with longer geologic durations have morphologies that are more average than expected by chance alone. I evaluate this hypothesis for both individual lineages with longer durations and groups of lineages with longer durations, using more than 60 published datasets of animals with adequate fossil records. Analyses presented here show that groups of lineages with longer durations fall empirically into one of three theoretically possible scenarios, namely: (1) the morphology of groups of longer duration lineages is closer to the grand average of their inclusive group, that is, their relative morphological distance is smaller than expected by chance alone, when compared with rarified samples of their shorter duration relatives (a negative group morpho-duration distribution); (2) the relative morphological distance of groups of longer duration lineages is no different from rarified samples of their shorter duration relatives (a null group morpho-duration distribution); and (3) the relative morphological distance of groups of longer duration lineages is greater than expected when compared with rarified samples of their shorter duration relatives (a positive group morpho-duration distribution). Datasets exhibiting negative group morpho-duration distributions predominate. However, lineages with higher ranks in the Linnean hierarchy demonstrate positive morpho-duration distributions more frequently. The relative morphological distance of individual longer duration lineages is no different from that of rarified samples of their shorter duration relatives (a null individual morpho-duration distribution) for the majority of datasets studied. Contrary to the common idea that very persistent lineages are special or unique in some significant way, both the results from analyses of long-duration lineages as groups and individuals show that they are morphologically average. Persistent lineages often arise early in a group's history, even though there is no prior expectation for this tendency in datasets of extinct groups. The implications of these results for diversification histories and niche preemption are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17439619     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00077.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  13 in total

1.  Phylogenetic correlates of extinction risk in mammals: species in older lineages are not at greater risk.

Authors:  Luis Darcy Verde Arregoitia; Simon P Blomberg; Diana O Fisher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebrates.

Authors:  Michael E Alfaro; Francesco Santini; Chad Brock; Hugo Alamillo; Alex Dornburg; Daniel L Rabosky; Giorgio Carnevale; Luke J Harmon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Higher origination and extinction rates in larger mammals.

Authors:  Lee Hsiang Liow; Mikael Fortelius; Ella Bingham; Kari Lintulaakso; Heikki Mannila; Larry Flynn; Nils Chr Stenseth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Fossils, phylogenies, and the challenge of preserving evolutionary history in the face of anthropogenic extinctions.

Authors:  Danwei Huang; Emma E Goldberg; Kaustuv Roy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolutionary constraints on disparity of ericaceous pollen grains.

Authors:  Ying Yu; Harald Schneider; De-Zhu Li; Hong Wang
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Evolutionary legacies in contemporary tetrapod imperilment.

Authors:  Dan A Greenberg; R Alexander Pyron; Liam G W Johnson; Nathan S Upham; Walter Jetz; Arne Ø Mooers
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 11.274

7.  Conserving evolutionary history does not result in greater diversity over geological time scales.

Authors:  J L Cantalapiedra; T Aze; M W Cadotte; G V Dalla Riva; D Huang; F Mazel; M W Pennell; M Ríos; A Ø Mooers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  An inordinate fondness for eukaryotic diversity.

Authors:  Luke J Harmon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 9.  Are specialists at risk under environmental change? Neoecological, paleoecological and phylogenetic approaches.

Authors:  Audrey Colles; Lee Hsiang Liow; Andreas Prinzing
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Rethinking Living Fossils.

Authors:  Scott Lidgard; Alan C Love
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 8.589

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.