Literature DB >> 17439609

Genetic analysis of autosomal and X-linked markers across a mouse hybrid zone.

Milos Macholán1, Pavel Munclinger, Monika Sugerková, Petra Dufková, Barbora Bímová, Eva Bozíková, Jan Zima, Jaroslav Piálek.   

Abstract

In this paper, we present results of the first comprehensive study of the introgression of both autosomal and sex-chromosome markers across the central European portion of the hybrid zone between two house mouse subspecies, Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus. More than 1800 individuals sampled from 105 sites were analyzed with a set of allozyme loci (hopefully representing neutral or nearly neutral markers) and X-linked loci (which are assumed to be under selection). The zone center is best modeled as a single straight line independent of fine-scale local geographic or climatic conditions, being maintained by a balance between dispersal and selection against hybrids. The width (w) of the multilocus autosomal cline was estimated as 9.6 km whereas the estimate for the compound X-chromosome cline was about 4.6 km only. As the former estimate is comparable to that of the Danish portion of the zone (assumed to be much younger than the central European one), zone width does not appear to be related to its age. The strength (B) of the central barrier was estimated as about 20 km; with dispersal (sigma) of about 1 km/gen(1/2), this means effective selection (s*) is approximately 0.06-0.09 for autosomal loci and about 0.25 for X-linked loci. The number of loci under selection was estimated as N= 56-99 for autosomes and about 380 for X-linked loci. Finally, we highlight some potential pitfalls in hybrid zone analyses and in comparisons of different transects. We suggest that conclusions about parts of the mouse genome involved in reproductive isolation and speciation should be drawn with caution and that analytical approaches always providing some estimates should not be used without due care regarding the support or confidence of such estimates, especially if conclusions are based on the difference between these estimates. Finally, we recommend that analysis in two-dimensional space, dense sampling, and rigorous treatment of data, including inspection of likelihood profiles, are essential for hybrid zone studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17439609     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00065.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  73 in total

Review 1.  Recombination rate variation and speciation: theoretical predictions and empirical results from rabbits and mice.

Authors:  Michael W Nachman; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Genomics of isolation in hybrids.

Authors:  Zachariah Gompert; Thomas L Parchman; C Alex Buerkle
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Genetic structure and contrasting selection pattern at two major histocompatibility complex genes in wild house mouse populations.

Authors:  D Cížková; J Gouy de Bellocq; S J E Baird; J Piálek; J Bryja
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Sperm quality, aggressiveness and generation turnover may facilitate unidirectional Y chromosome introgression across the European house mouse hybrid zone.

Authors:  Barbora Vošlajerová Bímová; Miloš Macholán; Ľudovít Ďureje; Kateřina Berchová Bímová; Iva Martincová; Jaroslav Piálek
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Extraordinary sequence divergence at Tsga8, an X-linked gene involved in mouse spermiogenesis.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Good; Dan Vanderpool; Kimberly L Smith; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  The contribution of the Y chromosome to hybrid male sterility in house mice.

Authors:  Polly Campbell; Jeffrey M Good; Matthew D Dean; Priscilla K Tucker; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Higher differentiation among subspecies of the house mouse (Mus musculus) in genomic regions with low recombination.

Authors:  A Geraldes; P Basset; K L Smith; M W Nachman
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Genetic dissection of a key reproductive barrier between nascent species of house mice.

Authors:  Michael A White; Brian Steffy; Tim Wiltshire; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Deconstructing Mus gemischus: advances in understanding ancestry, structure, and variation in the genome of the laboratory mouse.

Authors:  John P Didion; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 2.957

10.  Steep clines within a highly permeable genome across a hybrid zone between two subspecies of the European rabbit.

Authors:  Miguel Carneiro; Stuart J E Baird; Sandra Afonso; Esther Ramirez; Pedro Tarroso; Henrique Teotónio; Rafael Villafuerte; Michael W Nachman; Nuno Ferrand
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 6.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.