Literature DB >> 17439460

Regional climate modulates the canopy mosaic of favourable and risky microclimates for insects.

Sylvain Pincebourde1, Herve Sinoquet, Didier Combes, Jerome Casas.   

Abstract

1. One major gap in our ability to predict the impacts of climate change is a quantitative analysis of temperatures experienced by organisms under natural conditions. We developed a framework to describe and quantify the impacts of local climate on the mosaic of microclimates and physiological states of insects within tree canopies. This approach was applied to a leaf mining moth feeding on apple leaf tissues. 2. Canopy geometry was explicitly considered by mapping the 3D position and orientation of more than 26 000 leaves in an apple tree. Four published models for canopy radiation interception, energy budget of leaves and mines, body temperature and developmental rate of the leaf miner were integrated. Model predictions were compared with actual microclimate temperatures. The biophysical model accurately predicted temperature within mines at different positions within the tree crown. 3. Field temperature measurements indicated that leaf and mine temperature patterns differ according to the regional climatic conditions (cloudy or sunny) and depending on their location within the canopy. Mines in the sun can be warmer than those in the shade by several degrees and the heterogeneity of mine temperature was incremented by 120%, compared with that of leaf temperature. 4. The integrated model was used to explore the impact of both warm and exceptionally hot climatic conditions recorded during a heat wave on the microclimate heterogeneity at canopy scale. During warm conditions, larvae in sunlight-exposed mines experienced nearly optimal growth conditions compared with those within shaded mines. The developmental rate was increased by almost 50% in the sunny microhabitat compared with the shaded location. Larvae, however, experienced optimal temperatures for their development inside shaded mines during extreme climatic conditions, whereas larvae in exposed mines were overheating, leading to major risks of mortality. 5. Tree canopies act as both magnifiers and reducers of the climatic regime experienced in open air outside canopies. Favourable and risky spots within the canopy do change as a function of the climatic conditions at the regional scale. The shifting nature of the mosaic of suitable and risky habitats may explain the observed uniform distribution of leaf miners within tree canopies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17439460     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01231.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  12 in total

1.  Circular distribution pattern of plant modulars and endophagous herbivory within tree crowns: the impact of roadside light conditions.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Dai; Jia-Sheng Xu; Xing-Lu Ding
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.857

2.  A single hot event stimulates adult performance but reduces egg survival in the oriental fruit moth, Grapholitha molesta.

Authors:  Li-Na Liang; Wei Zhang; Gang Ma; Ary A Hoffmann; Chun-Sen Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Impact of hot events at different developmental stages of a moth: the closer to adult stage, the less reproductive output.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Xiang-Qian Chang; AryA Hoffmann; Shu Zhang; Chun-Sen Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Structure is more important than physiology for estimating intracanopy distributions of leaf temperatures.

Authors:  H Arthur Woods; Marc Saudreau; Sylvain Pincebourde
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Mapping physiology: biophysical mechanisms define scales of climate change impacts.

Authors:  Francis Choi; Tarik Gouhier; Fernando Lima; Gil Rilov; Rui Seabra; Brian Helmuth
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.079

6.  Habitat characteristics and climatic factors influence microhabitat selection and arthropod community structure in a globally rare central Appalachian shale barren.

Authors:  Andrew P Landsman; Clara R Thiel
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Canopy distribution and microclimate preferences of sterile and wild Queensland fruit flies.

Authors:  Jess R Inskeep; Andrew P Allen; Phillip W Taylor; Polychronis Rempoulakis; Christopher W Weldon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Fragmentation impairs the microclimate buffering effect of tropical forests.

Authors:  Robert M Ewers; Cristina Banks-Leite
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Are heat waves susceptible to mitigate the expansion of a species progressing with global warming?

Authors:  Christelle Robinet; Jérôme Rousselet; Patrick Pineau; Florie Miard; Alain Roques
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Thermal pace-of-life strategies improve phenological predictions in ectotherms.

Authors:  Quentin Struelens; François Rebaudo; Reinaldo Quispe; Olivier Dangles
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.