V Mung'ala-Odera1, C R J C Newton. 1. Center for Geographic Medicine-Coast, Kenya Medical Research Institute, P.O. 428 Kilifi, Kenya. vodera@kilifi.kemri-wellcome.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The burden of neurological impairment (NI) in children living in resource-poor countries (RPCs) is unknown. This lack of data is caused by inappropriate case detection techniques. In RPCs, the most appropriate method should be inexpensive, simple, rapid and accurate. This article reviews methods used to identify children with NI and disability in RPCs, evaluating their effectiveness and suitability. METHODS: A search of relevant articles was performed using the National Library of Medicine via PubMed and Medline search engines. In addition, bibliographies of reviews were also browsed to identify additional articles, particularly those from World Health Organization and United Nations sources and from government and unpublished reports. Key phrases used included impairment, disability or handicap and the following terms: identification, screening, prevalence and developing countries. Studies included were those that fulfilled the following criteria; performed in RPCs, presented data in detail to allow reanalysis and provided data on cost and validity of the methods. RESULTS: Use of the national census, key informants and methods using rapid rural appraisal have low sensitivity and are not able to provide adequate information on diagnostic categories or risk factors. House-to-house surveys using questionnaires have high sensitivities (63-100%) in the detection of impairment, but this approach remains relatively expensive and cannot be applied to an entire population (e.g. a region or country) and is thus less useful for assessing the needs of disability. Furthermore, the sensitivity is decreased in the detection of some domains, e.g. cognition. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the approaches used for identifying individuals with NI or disability suffer from inadequacies, the main ones being low sensitivity and underreporting. To assess the burden, nationwide censuses combined with surveys in selected areas of the country may be useful. These systems, however, require validation to establish their suitability.
BACKGROUND: The burden of neurological impairment (NI) in children living in resource-poor countries (RPCs) is unknown. This lack of data is caused by inappropriate case detection techniques. In RPCs, the most appropriate method should be inexpensive, simple, rapid and accurate. This article reviews methods used to identify children with NI and disability in RPCs, evaluating their effectiveness and suitability. METHODS: A search of relevant articles was performed using the National Library of Medicine via PubMed and Medline search engines. In addition, bibliographies of reviews were also browsed to identify additional articles, particularly those from World Health Organization and United Nations sources and from government and unpublished reports. Key phrases used included impairment, disability or handicap and the following terms: identification, screening, prevalence and developing countries. Studies included were those that fulfilled the following criteria; performed in RPCs, presented data in detail to allow reanalysis and provided data on cost and validity of the methods. RESULTS: Use of the national census, key informants and methods using rapid rural appraisal have low sensitivity and are not able to provide adequate information on diagnostic categories or risk factors. House-to-house surveys using questionnaires have high sensitivities (63-100%) in the detection of impairment, but this approach remains relatively expensive and cannot be applied to an entire population (e.g. a region or country) and is thus less useful for assessing the needs of disability. Furthermore, the sensitivity is decreased in the detection of some domains, e.g. cognition. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the approaches used for identifying individuals with NI or disability suffer from inadequacies, the main ones being low sensitivity and underreporting. To assess the burden, nationwide censuses combined with surveys in selected areas of the country may be useful. These systems, however, require validation to establish their suitability.
Authors: Silvana Santos; Anne Aluska da Silva Pequeno; André Pessoa; Claudia Regina Cabral Galvão; Jovany Luiz Alves de Medeiros; Weller Mathias; Fernando Kok Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2013-11-26
Authors: Penny Lewthwaite; Ashia Begum; Mong How Ooi; Brian Faragher; Boon Foo Lai; Indunil Sandaradura; Anand Mohan; Gaurav Mandhan; Pratibha Meharwade; S Subhashini; Gulia Abhishek; Asma Begum; Srihari Penkulinti; M Veera Shankar; R Ravikumar; Carolyn Young; Mary Jane Cardosa; V Ravi; See Chang Wong; Rachel Kneen; Tom Solomon Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2010-04-19 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Najibah A Galadanci; Shehu Umar Abdullahi; Leah D Vance; Abdulkadir Musa Tabari; Shehi Ali; Raymond Belonwu; Auwal Salihu; Aisha Amal Galadanci; Binta Wudil Jibir; Halima Bello-Manga; Kathleen Neville; Fenella J Kirkham; Yu Shyr; Sharon Phillips; Brittany V Covert; Adetola A Kassim; Lori C Jordan; Muktar H Aliyu; Michael R DeBaun Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Kavita Ruparelia; Amina Abubakar; Eben Badoe; Muideen Bakare; Karren Visser; Diane C Chugani; Harry T Chugani; Kirsten A Donald; Jo M Wilmshurst; Andy Shih; David Skuse; Charles R Newton Journal: J Child Neurol Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 1.987
Authors: Margaret Semrud-Clikeman; Regilda Anne A Romero; Elizabeth L Prado; Elsa G Shapiro; Paul Bangirana; Chandy C John Journal: Child Neuropsychol Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Stephen Ray; Ajit Rayamajhi; Laura J Bonnett; Tom Solomon; Rachel Kneen; Michael J Griffiths Journal: Paediatr Int Child Health Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Anthony K Ngugi; Christian Bottomley; Eddie Chengo; Martha Z Kombe; Michael Kazungu; Evasius Bauni; Caroline K Mbuba; Immo Kleinschmidt; Charles R Newton Journal: Emerg Themes Epidemiol Date: 2012-11-21