Literature DB >> 17439342

Impaired percent alpha variability on continuous electroencephalography is associated with thalamic injury and predicts poor long-term outcome after human traumatic brain injury.

Matthew O Hebb1, David L McArthur, Jeffry Alger, Maria Etchepare, Thomas C Glenn, Marvin Bergsneider, Neil Martin, Paul M Vespa.   

Abstract

Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) is potentially useful in determining prognosis in patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBI). The objective of this prospective, observational cohort study was to determine if the percent alpha variability (PAV) on cEEG was predictive of outcome following TBI. Injury characteristics were indexed to assess whether lesions in specific cerebral loci were correlated with PAV and patient recovery. Fifty-three TBI patients were studied using cEEG recording and serial neuroimaging. Clinical recovery was assessed at regular intervals in hospital and following discharge. The principal outcome measures included the mean 3-day PAV score, the 7-day PAV pattern, delineation of the anatomical sites of brain injury, and the 6-month clinical outcome, as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Significant univariate (p = 0.030) and multivariate (p = 0.008) relations were identified between PAV and GOS scores. PAV offered good discrimination between favorable and unfavorable 6-month outcomes (AUC 0.76) and, with a cutpoint of 0.20, had a sensitivity of 87% and negative predictive value of 82%. Multivariate modeling revealed that injuries of the thalamus (p = 0.009) and basal ganglia (p = 0.016), and the presence of diffuse edema (p = 0.009), were the key anatomical predictors of PAV. Brainstem injuries (p = 0.020) and indicators of diffuse cerebral trauma, such as deep white matter shearing (p = 0.036) and multiple subcortical lesions (p = 0.033), were the principal determinants of 6-month recovery. Inclusion of PAV enhanced the accuracy of prediction models that encompassed a selective combination of clinical and anatomical variables (adjusted R(2) = 0.458, p < 0.001). The two main results of this study are (1) PAV is a sensitive predictor of 6-month clinical outcomes following TBI, and (2) injury to the thalamus is related to impaired PAV. PAV appears best utilized as a functional adjunct to traditional clinical and anatomical predictors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17439342     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2006.0146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  16 in total

Review 1.  Continuous EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Kennedy; Elizabeth E Gerard
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Can quantitative EEG reliably predict deterioration from delayed cerebral ischemia secondary to vasospasm?

Authors:  J Michael Schmidt; Jan Claassen
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 3.  Research and technology in neurocritical care.

Authors:  C A C Wijman; S M Smirnakis; P Vespa; K Szigeti; W C Ziai; M M Ning; J Rosand; D F Hanley; R Geocadin; C Hall; P D Le Roux; J I Suarez; O O Zaidat
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 4.  Neurophysiological assessment of brain dysfunction in critically ill patients: an update.

Authors:  Eric Azabou; Catherine Fischer; Jean Michel Guerit; Djillali Annane; François Mauguiere; Fréderic Lofaso; Tarek Sharshar
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 5.  Physiological monitoring of the severe traumatic brain injury patient in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Peter Le Roux
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.081

6.  Pre-stimulus Alpha Oscillations and Inter-subject Variability of Motor Evoked Potentials in Single- and Paired-Pulse TMS Paradigms.

Authors:  Zafer Iscan; Maria Nazarova; Tommaso Fedele; Evgeny Blagovechtchenski; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Current Status and Recommendations in Multimodal Neuromonitoring.

Authors:  Radhika S Ruhatiya; Sachin A Adukia; Ramya B Manjunath; Harish M Maheshwarappa
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-05

Review 8.  Electrophysiologic monitoring in acute brain injury.

Authors:  Jan Claassen; Paul Vespa
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 9.  Clinical review: neuromonitoring - an update.

Authors:  Nino Stocchetti; Peter Le Roux; Paul Vespa; Mauro Oddo; Giuseppe Citerio; Peter J Andrews; Robert D Stevens; Tarek Sharshar; Fabio S Taccone; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Predicting outcome in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury using electroencephalography.

Authors:  Marjolein E Haveman; Michel J A M Van Putten; Harold W Hom; Carin J Eertman-Meyer; Albertus Beishuizen; Marleen C Tjepkema-Cloostermans
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.