UNLABELLED: Our purpose in this study was to access the pulmonary effects of mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP; 10 cmH2O) or without PEEP (zero PEEP-ZEEP) in a rat model of acute myocardial infarction that resulted in hypotension but not in pulmonary congestion. METHODS: Wistar rats were anesthetized (1.5% isoflurane) and myocardial infarct was induced by ligature of the anterior interventricular coronary artery. Rats with myocardial infarct were compared with sham-operated (Sham) and closed thorax groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: There was a significant decrease in MAP in the acute myocardial infarct group (92.5 +/- 4.2 mmHg) when compared with closed chest group (113.0 +/- 4.4 mmHg). There was no significant difference between acute myocardial infarct and Sham groups in PEEP or ZEEP. Mechanical ventilation for 120 min resulted in a significant increase in respiratory system elastance in the groups ventilated with ZEEP (2.59 +/- 0.17 and 2.32 +/- 0.17 cmH2O.mL, Sham and acute myocardial infarct groups, respectively). This effect of mechanical ventilation was not observed in the presence of PEEP in both groups. There was no significant increase in the amount of perivascular pulmonary edema measured in all groups studied. Mean airspace linear intercept and lung tissue distortion index also did not show statistically significant difference between Sham and acute myocardial infarct groups. We conclude that in this experimental model of acute myocardial infarct (12.4 +/- 4.1% area of necrotic tissue and 26.4 +/- 4.0% area of ischemic tissue), there was a protective pulmonary effect of PEEP.
UNLABELLED: Our purpose in this study was to access the pulmonary effects of mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP; 10 cmH2O) or without PEEP (zero PEEP-ZEEP) in a rat model of acute myocardial infarction that resulted in hypotension but not in pulmonary congestion. METHODS:Wistar rats were anesthetized (1.5% isoflurane) and myocardial infarct was induced by ligature of the anterior interventricular coronary artery. Rats with myocardial infarct were compared with sham-operated (Sham) and closed thorax groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: There was a significant decrease in MAP in the acute myocardial infarct group (92.5 +/- 4.2 mmHg) when compared with closed chest group (113.0 +/- 4.4 mmHg). There was no significant difference between acute myocardial infarct and Sham groups in PEEP or ZEEP. Mechanical ventilation for 120 min resulted in a significant increase in respiratory system elastance in the groups ventilated with ZEEP (2.59 +/- 0.17 and 2.32 +/- 0.17 cmH2O.mL, Sham and acute myocardial infarct groups, respectively). This effect of mechanical ventilation was not observed in the presence of PEEP in both groups. There was no significant increase in the amount of perivascular pulmonary edema measured in all groups studied. Mean airspace linear intercept and lung tissue distortion index also did not show statistically significant difference between Sham and acute myocardial infarct groups. We conclude that in this experimental model of acute myocardial infarct (12.4 +/- 4.1% area of necrotic tissue and 26.4 +/- 4.0% area of ischemic tissue), there was a protective pulmonary effect of PEEP.
Authors: Luciano R Filgueiras; Joilson O Martins; Carlos H Serezani; Vera L Capelozzi; Marlise B A Montes; Sonia Jancar Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 3.240