Literature DB >> 17438017

Electrophysiological evidence that olfactory cell transplants improve function after spinal cord injury.

Andrew Toft1, Dugald T Scott, Susan C Barnett, John S Riddell.   

Abstract

Transplants of cells obtained from the olfactory system are a potential treatment for spinal cord injury and a number of clinical trials are in progress. However, the extent to which transplants improve recovery of function remains unclear and there are contradictory reports on the extent to which they support axonal regeneration. Here, we have used anatomical and electrophysiological techniques to investigate the repair promoted by olfactory cell transplants after a dorsal column lesion. Since the use of olfactory cells of varying type and origin may contribute to the differing outcomes of previous studies, regeneration of dorsal column axons was compared following transplants of pure olfactory ensheathing cells from neonatal animals and mixed olfactory cells from both neonatal and adult rats. Two to three months after lesioning, numerous regenerating fibres could be seen in each type of transplant. However, tracing of ascending dorsal column fibres showed that few regenerated beyond the lesion, even when transplanted with mixed olfactory cells from the adult olfactory bulb which have previously been reported to support regeneration which bridges a lesion. Despite the absence of axonal regeneration across the injury site, olfactory cell transplants led to improved spinal cord function in sensory pathways investigated electrophysiologically. When cord dorsum potentials (CDPs), evoked by electrical stimulation of the L4/L5 dorsal roots, were recorded from the spinal cord above and below a lesion at the lumbar 3/4 level, CDPs recorded from transplanted animals were significantly larger than those recorded from lesioned controls. In addition, sensory evoked potentials recorded over the sensorimotor cortex were larger and detectable over a more extensive area in transplanted animals. These results provide direct evidence that transplants of olfactory cells preserve the function of circuitry in the region of the lesion site and of ascending pathways originating near the injury. These actions, rather than axonal regeneration, may help ameliorate the effects of spinal cord injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17438017     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awm040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  22 in total

1.  Cell Therapy From Bench to Bedside Translation in CNS Neurorestoratology Era.

Authors:  Hongyun Huang; Lin Chen; Paul Sanberg
Journal:  Cell Med       Date:  2010-01-01

2.  Effectiveness of intense, activity-based physical therapy for individuals with spinal cord injury in promoting motor and sensory recovery: is olfactory mucosa autograft a factor?

Authors:  Cathy A Larson; Paula M Dension
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  A systematic review of cellular transplantation therapies for spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Wolfram Tetzlaff; Elena B Okon; Soheila Karimi-Abdolrezaee; Caitlin E Hill; Joseph S Sparling; Jason R Plemel; Ward T Plunet; Eve C Tsai; Darryl Baptiste; Laura J Smithson; Michael D Kawaja; Michael G Fehlings; Brian K Kwon
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Transplantation of Cultured Olfactory Bulb Cells Prevents Abnormal Sensory Responses During Recovery From Dorsal Root Avulsion in the Rat.

Authors:  Andrew Collins; Daqing Li; Stephen B McMahon; Geoffrey Raisman; Ying Li
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Schwann cells but not olfactory ensheathing cells inhibit CNS myelination via the secretion of connective tissue growth factor.

Authors:  Rebecca Lamond; Susan C Barnett
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Stem cell/cellular interventions in human spinal cord injury: Is it time to move from guidelines to regulations and legislations? Literature review and Spinal Cord Society position statement.

Authors:  Harvinder S Chhabra; Kanchan Sarda; Geeta Jotwani; M Gourie-Devi; Erkan Kaptanoglu; Susan Charlifue; S L Yadav; B Mohapatra; Abhishek Srivastava; Kedar Phadke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Effects of Neural Stem Cell and Olfactory Ensheathing Cell Co-transplants on Tissue Remodelling After Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia in the Adult Rat.

Authors:  Ingrid Lovise Augestad; Axel Karl Gottfrid Nyman; Alex Ignatius Costa; Susan Carol Barnett; Axel Sandvig; Asta Kristine Håberg; Ioanna Sandvig
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.996

8.  High-Yield Mucosal Olfactory Ensheathing Cells Restore Loss of Function in Rat Dorsal Root Injury.

Authors:  Kamile Minkelyte; Andrew Collins; Modinat Liadi; Ahmed Ibrahim; Daqing Li; Ying Li
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 9.  Cell transplantation for spinal cord injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jun Li; Guilherme Lepski
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Multi-target approaches to CNS repair: olfactory mucosa-derived cells and heparan sulfates.

Authors:  Susan L Lindsay; George A McCanney; Alice G Willison; Susan C Barnett
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 42.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.