Literature DB >> 17438008

A ten-year single-centre experience in children on chronic peritoneal dialysis--significance of percutaneous placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters.

Nejat Aksu1, Onder Yavascan, Murat Anil, Orhan Deniz Kara, Hakan Erdogan, Alkan Bal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) in children is an important modality of renal replacement therapy. The ideal method for inserting CPD catheters remains still controversial. Minimal invasive techniques are becoming more popular. This study was performed in order to evaluate the efficiency, the complication profile and the survey of percutaneously placed CPD catheters in children, retrospectively.
METHODS: This study was carried out on 108 peritoneal catheters implanted in 93 patients (45 girls, 48 boys), aged 8.0+/-4.2 years (range: 3 months to 16 years) during the period between December 1995 and November 2005. In the study group, 32 children were transplanted, 15 were transferred to haemodialysis and 18 patients died. All catheters implanted by percutaneous route were Tenckhoff swan-neck double-cuff paediatric catheters. Placement procedure was performed in our unit by us. Statistical analysis was made by chi-square and Kaplan-Meier methods.
RESULTS: During 2670 CPD months we observed a total of 108 catheter-related complications: 82 catheter infections including exit-site and/or tunnel infection (1/32.5 patient-months), 10 dislocations, six drainage problems and six kinks. The incidence of all complications was one complication every 24.72 dialysis months. Overall, the incidence of peritonitis was one episode per 18.1 patient-months. Pseudomonas spp. and Staphylococcus aureus were the two most common causes of infections. Fifteen catheters were removed due to catheter-related causes: drainage problems (six patients), catheter dislocation (three patients), omental capture (two patients) kink (two patients) and tunnel infection (two patients). The catheter survival rate was 92.4% at 1 year, 83% at 2 years and 63% at 10 years; patient survival in the 93 children was 91% at 1 year, 84% at 2 years and 48% at 10 years. Younger patients were at increased risk of exit-site and tunnel infections (P<0.05) but the difference in catheter survival time between the age groups was not significant (P>0.05). In complications, no statistical difference was observed between early and delayed catheter use groups (P>0.05). We compared the two periods (period 1, December 1995 to November 2000; period 2, December 2000 to November 2005), for complications of CPD. The risk of catheter migration was greater in period 1 than in period 2 (P=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: The percutaneous technique performed by experienced nephrologists is a reliable, safe and cost-effective method for placement of PD catheters. In our opinion, the skill for CPD catheter placement must be part of the paediatric nephrologist training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17438008     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfm150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  16 in total

1.  A New Anchor Technique on the Peritoneal Wall for Preventing Dislocation of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters Using the Anterior Rectus Fascia in a Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Patient.

Authors:  Masaki Muramatsu; Seiichiro Shishido; Yuko Hamasaki; Toshihide Mizutani; Ryoko Harada; Kei Hasegawa; Takeshi Kawamura; Atsushi Aikawa
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Chronic peritoneal dialysis in children: the role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of peritoneal catheter obstruction.

Authors:  Francesco Esposito; Marco Di Serafino; Concetta Ambrosio; Maria Rita Panico; Francesca Malacario; Carmela Mercogliano; Carmine Pecoraro; Patrizia Oresta
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2016-05-25

3.  Unusual exit site of a migrated peritoneal dialysis catheter.

Authors:  T Y Fung; A G Peppelenbosch; S Ferdowsbari; F M van der Sande; T Cornelis
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 4.  Peritoneal dialysis in children with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Franz Schaefer; Bradley A Warady
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 5.  Peritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Brett Cullis; Mohamed Abdelraheem; Georgi Abrahams; Andre Balbi; Dinna N Cruz; Yaacov Frishberg; Vera Koch; Mignon McCulloch; Alp Numanoglu; Peter Nourse; Roberto Pecoits-Filho; Daniela Ponce; Bradley Warady; Karen Yeates; Fredric O Finkelstein
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Guidelines for laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis access surgery.

Authors:  Stephen Haggerty; Scott Roth; Danielle Walsh; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Raymond Price; Robert D Fanelli; Todd Penner; William Richardson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Peritoneal dialysis for the management of pediatric patients with acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Anil Vasudevan; Kishore Phadke; Hui-Kim Yap
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Chronic peritoneal dialysis in children with special needs or social disadvantage or both: contraindications are not always contraindications.

Authors:  Nejat Aksu; Onder Yavascan; Murat Anil; Orhan Deniz Kara; Alkan Bal; Ayse Berna Anil
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Challenges in pediatric peritoneal dialysis in Turkey.

Authors:  Mesiha Ekim; Sevcan A Bakkaloglu; Nejat Aksu; Sema Akman; Aytul Noyan; Lale Sever
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Successes and pitfalls of chronic peritoneal dialysis in infants - a Polish nationwide outcome study.

Authors:  Anna Jander; Irena Makulska; Joanna Latoszyńska; Hanna Boguszewska-Bączkowska; Irena Bałasz-Chmielewska; Ilona Zagożdżon; Iga Załuska-Leśniewska; Ewa Stefaniak; Beata Leszczyńska; Katarzyna Zachwieja; Ryszard Wierciński; Hanna Kipigroch; Barbara Kołłątaj; Marcin Tkaczyk
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.