Literature DB >> 17437776

Bladder and upper tract urothelial cancer.

Badrinath R Konety1, Geoffrey F Joyce, Matthew Wise.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: While there are data available indicating the incidence and prevalence of bladder and upper tract urothelial cancer, population level data on resource use, costs and patterns of care for these cancers are limited. We quantified the economic impact of caring for patients with bladder and upper tract urothelial cancer, and determined the primary drivers for such costs in the population in the United States.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analytical methods used to generate these results have been described previously.
RESULTS: An increasing proportion of patients with bladder and upper tract urothelial cancer were being treated in the outpatient setting. Most care was provided by urologists and visit frequency was directly related to disease stage. Only a small proportion of patients potentially eligible for chemotherapy, ie those with advanced disease, sought specialized care from oncologists. Office based diagnostic tests such as cytology were not commonly done, although a substantial number of patients with bladder cancer underwent cystoscopy. The use of excretory urography in these patients was decreasing, while the use of computerized tomography was increasing. Ileal conduits were the most frequently performed type of urinary diversion following cystectomy. The cystectomy rate remained unchanged for a decade. Intravesical therapy was done infrequently in patients with bladder cancer. Annual costs for treating bladder and upper urinary tract cancers were $1 billion and $64 million, respectively, in 2000. These costs represented a $164 million increase over 1994 levels, which outpaced inflation.
CONCLUSIONS: The costs of treating bladder cancer increased steadily during a 6-year period despite a decrease in inpatient care. Coupled with a lack of substantial change in transurethral resection and cystectomy rates, this suggests that the primary cost drivers are increased outpatient testing, eg computerized tomography and cystoscopy, and an increase in the number of diagnosed cases. Greater focus on selective use of testing modalities, preventive care such as smoking cessation and earlier identification of patients at risk may help curtail further expenditure with regard to managing bladder and upper urinary tract cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17437776     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

1.  A pretreatment nomogram predicting recurrence- and progression-free survival for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer in Japanese patients.

Authors:  Toru Yamada; Kunihiro Tsuchiya; Seiichi Kato; Shingo Kamei; Mitsuhiro Taniguchi; Toshimi Takeuchi; Naoki Yamamoto; Hidetoshi Ehara; Takashi Deguchi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Ajjai S Alva; Surena F Matin; Seth P Lerner; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  The health economics of bladder cancer: an updated review of the published literature.

Authors:  Christina Yeung; Tuan Dinh; Joseph Lee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The demographic burden of urologic diseases in America.

Authors:  David C Miller; Christopher S Saigal; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  Aminopeptidase activities as prospective urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taylor; Mariana Yaneva; Kevin Velasco; John Philip; Hediye Erdjument-Bromage; Irina Ostrovnaya; Hans G Lilja; Bernard H Bochner; Paul Tempst
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 6.  Bacillus Calmette-Guerin immunotherapy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Timothy P Kresowik; Thomas S Griffith
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.196

7.  Predictors of intravesical therapy for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: results from the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program 2003 patterns of care project.

Authors:  George J Huang; Ann S Hamilton; Mary Lo; John P Stein; David F Penson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Combining mTOR inhibition with radiation improves antitumor activity in bladder cancer cells in vitro and in vivo: a novel strategy for treatment.

Authors:  Roland Nassim; Jose Joao Mansure; Simone Chevalier; Fabio Cury; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The awareness of patients with non - muscle invasive bladder cancer regarding the importance of smoking cessation and their access to smoking cessation programs.

Authors:  Emrah Yuruk; Murat Tuken; Aykut Colakerol; Ege Can Serefoglu
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 10.  Economic aspects of bladder cancer: what are the benefits and costs?

Authors:  K D Sievert; B Amend; U Nagele; D Schilling; J Bedke; M Horstmann; J Hennenlotter; S Kruck; A Stenzl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 4.226

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.