Literature DB >> 17437556

Does the error negativity reflect response conflict strength? Evidence from a Simon task.

Hiroaki Masaki1, Michael Falkenstein, Birgit Stürmer, Thomas Pinkpank, Werner Sommer.   

Abstract

The error (-related) negativity (Ne or ERN) has been related to detecting the mismatch between incorrectly executed and appropriate responses or, alternatively, to the degree of conflict between different response alternatives. In this study different levels of response conflict were generated by manipulating task difficulty in a Simon task. According to the product of incorrect and subsequent correct EMG activation, the amount of conflict in error trials was indeed larger for the easy than for the hard condition. In contrast, Ne/ERN amplitudes did not differ between difficulty conditions, nor was the amount of conflict mirrored by Ne/ERN amplitude. Therefore, the present data are at variance with the hypothesis that the Ne/ERN reflects the degree of response conflict.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17437556     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00522.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  16 in total

1.  Working memory demands modulate cognitive control in the Stroop paradigm.

Authors:  Alexander Soutschek; Tilo Strobach; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-03-06

2.  Error monitoring dysfunction across the illness course of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Veronica B Perez; Judith M Ford; Brian J Roach; Scott W Woods; Thomas H McGlashan; Vinod H Srihari; Rachel L Loewy; Sophia Vinogradov; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2011-11-07

Review 3.  Individual differences and developmental change in the ERN response: implications for models of ACC function.

Authors:  Sidney J Segalowitz; Jane Dywan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-21

4.  Does familiarity or conflict account for performance in the word-stem completion task? Evidence from behavioural and event-related-potential data.

Authors:  Florian Klonek; Sascha Tamm; Markus J Hofmann; Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-27

5.  Electrocortical and behavioral measures of response monitoring in young children during a Go/No-Go task.

Authors:  Dana C Torpey; Greg Hajcak; Jiyon Kim; Autumn Kujawa; Daniel N Klein
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.038

6.  Error-related negativity in individuals with obsessive-compulsive symptoms: toward an understanding of hoarding behaviors.

Authors:  Carol A Mathews; Veronica B Perez; Kevin L Delucchi; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Development of and change in cognitive control: a comparison of children, young adults, and older adults.

Authors:  David Friedman; Doreen Nessler; Yael M Cycowicz; Cort Horton
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Personality and error monitoring: an update.

Authors:  Sven Hoffmann; Edmund Wascher; Michael Falkenstein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Aging and error processing: age related increase in the variability of the error-negativity is not accompanied by increase in response variability.

Authors:  Sven Hoffmann; Michael Falkenstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  To head or to heed? Beyond the surface of selective action inhibition: a review.

Authors:  Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Scott A Wylie; Birte U Forstmann; Borís Burle; Thierry Hasbroucq; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.