Literature DB >> 17437498

Comparing oxygen transfer performance between three membrane oxygenators: effect of temperature changes during cardiopulmonary bypass.

David Jegger1, Hendrik T Tevaearai, Iker Mallabiabarrena, Judith Horisberger, Isabelle Seigneul, Ludwig K von Segesser.   

Abstract

Recently, a new oxygenator (Dideco 903 [D903], Dideco, Mirandola, Italy) has been introduced to the perfusion community, and we set about testing its oxygen transfer performance and then comparing it to two other models. This evaluation was based on the comparison between oxygen transfer slope, gas phase arterial oxygen gradients, degree of blood shunting, maximum oxygen transfer, and diffusing capacity calculated for each membrane. Sixty patients were randomized into three groups of oxygenators (Dideco 703 [D703], Dideco; D903; and Quadrox, Jostra Medizintechnik AG, Hirrlingen, Germany) including 40/20 M/F of 68.6 +/- 11.3 years old, with a body weight of 71.5 +/- 12.1 kg, a body surface area (BSA) of 1.84 +/- 0.3 m(2), and a theoretical blood flow rate (index 2.4 times BSA) of 4.4 +/- 0.7 L/min. The maximum oxygen transfer (VO(2)) values were 313 mL O(2)/min (D703), 579 mL O(2)/min (D903), and 400 mL O(2)/min (Quadrox), with the D903 being the most superior (P < 0.05). Oxygen (O(2)) gradients were 320 mm Hg (D703), 235 mm Hg (D903), and 247 mm Hg (Quadrox), meaning D903 and Quadrox are more efficient versus the D703 (P < 0.05). Shunt fraction (Qs/Qt) and diffusing capacity (DmO(2)) were comparable (P = ns). Diffusing capacity values indexed to BSA (DmO(2)/m(2)) were 0.15 mL O(2)/min/mm Hg/m(2) (D703), 0.2 mL O(2)/min/mm Hg/m(2) (D903), and 0.18 mL O(2)/min/mm Hg/m(2) (Quadrox) with D903 outperforming D703 (P < 0.0005). During hypothermia (32.0 +/- 0.3 degrees C), there was a lower absolute and relative VO(2 )for all three oxygenators (P = ns). The O(2) gradients, DmO(2) and DmO(2)/m(2), were significantly lower for all oxygenators (P < 0.01). Also, Qs/Qt significantly rose for all oxygenators (P < 0.01). The oxygen transfer curve is characteristic to each oxygenator type and represents a tool to quantify oxygenator performance. Using this parameter, we demonstrated significant differences among commercially available oxygenators. However, all three oxygenators are considered to meet the oxygen needs of the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17437498     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2007.00379.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  4 in total

1.  A theoretical model for evaluation of the design of a hollow-fiber membrane oxygenator.

Authors:  Hadi Tabesh; Ghassem Amoabediny; Ali Poorkhalil; Ali Khachab; Ali Kashefi; Khosrow Mottaghy
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Blood oxygenation and decarboxylation determinants during venovenous ECMO for respiratory failure in adults.

Authors:  Matthieu Schmidt; Guillaume Tachon; Christine Devilliers; Grégoire Muller; Guillaume Hekimian; Nicolas Bréchot; Sybille Merceron; Charles Edouard Luyt; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Jean Chastre; Pascal Leprince; Alain Combes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Oxygenator performance and artificial-native lung interaction.

Authors:  Francesco Epis; Mirko Belliato
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Effects on membrane lung gas exchange of an intermittent high gas flow recruitment maneuver: preliminary data in veno-venous ECMO patients.

Authors:  Luigi Castagna; Alberto Zanella; Vittorio Scaravilli; Federico Magni; Salua Abd El Aziz El Sayed Deab; Michele Introna; Francesco Mojoli; Giacomo Grasselli; Antonio Pesenti; Nicolò Patroniti
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 1.731

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.