Literature DB >> 17437282

Fronto-striatal dysfunction and potential compensatory mechanisms in male adolescents with fragile X syndrome.

Fumiko Hoeft1, Arvel Hernandez, Sudharshan Parthasarathy, Christa L Watson, Scott S Hall, Allan L Reiss.   

Abstract

Response inhibition is an important facet of executive function. Fragile X syndrome (FraX), with a known genetic etiology (fragile X mental retardation-1 (FMR1) mutation) and deficits in response inhibition, may be an ideal condition for elucidating interactions among gene-brain-behavior relationships. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have shown evidence of aberrant neural activity when individuals with FraX perform executive function tasks, though the specific nature of this altered activity or possible compensatory processes has yet to be elucidated. To address this question, we examined brain activation patterns using fMRI during a go/nogo task in adolescent males with FraX and in controls. The critical comparison was made between FraX individuals and age, gender, and intelligent quotient (IQ)-matched developmentally delayed controls; in addition to a control group of age and gender-matched typically developing individuals. The FraX group showed reduced activation in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) and right caudate head, and increased contralateral (left) VLPFC activation compared with both control groups. Individuals with FraX, but not controls, showed a significant positive correlation between task performance and activation in the left VLPFC. This potential compensatory activation was predicted by the interaction between FMR1 protein (FMRP) levels and right striatal dysfunction. These results suggest that right fronto-striatal dysfunction is likely an identifiable neuro-phenotypic feature of FraX and that activation of the left VLPFC during successful response inhibition may reflect compensatory processes. We further show that these putative compensatory processes can be predicted by a complex interaction between genetic risk and neural function. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17437282      PMCID: PMC6871315          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  47 in total

1.  Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses.

Authors:  K J Friston; A P Holmes; C J Price; C Büchel; K J Worsley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Cerebellar projections to the prefrontal cortex of the primate.

Authors:  F A Middleton; P L Strick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Immature frontal lobe contributions to cognitive control in children: evidence from fMRI.

Authors:  Silvia A Bunge; Nicole M Dudukovic; Moriah E Thomason; Chandan J Vaidya; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Genetic and environmental influences on the cognitive outcomes of children with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Jennifer Dyer-Friedman; Bronwyn Glaser; David Hessl; Cindy Johnston; Lynne C Huffman; Annette Taylor; Jacob Wisbeck; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.829

Review 5.  FMR1 gene and fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  B Bardoni; J L Mandel; G S Fisch
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2000

6.  Catechol O-methyltransferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine.

Authors:  Venkata S Mattay; Terry E Goldberg; Francesco Fera; Ahmad R Hariri; Alessandro Tessitore; Michael F Egan; Bhaskar Kolachana; Joseph H Callicott; Daniel R Weinberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  fMRI study of cognitive interference processing in females with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Leanne Tamm; Vinod Menon; Cindy K Johnston; David R Hessl; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Catechol-O-methyltransferase-deficient mice exhibit sexually dimorphic changes in catecholamine levels and behavior.

Authors:  J A Gogos; M Morgan; V Luine; M Santha; S Ogawa; D Pfaff; M Karayiorgou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Word retrieval learning modulates right frontal cortex in patients with left frontal damage.

Authors:  Valeria Blasi; Alexis C Young; Aaron P Tansy; Steven E Petersen; Abraham Z Snyder; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 10.  The behavioral neurogenetics of fragile X syndrome: analyzing gene-brain-behavior relationships in child developmental psychopathologies.

Authors:  Allan L Reiss; Christopher C Dant
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2003
View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  Fragile X syndrome: the GABAergic system and circuit dysfunction.

Authors:  Scott M Paluszkiewicz; Brandon S Martin; Molly M Huntsman
Journal:  Dev Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Discrimination learning and attentional set formation in a mouse model of Fragile X.

Authors:  Kimberly S Casten; Annette C Gray; Rebecca D Burwell
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 3.  Moving Toward Integrative, Multidimensional Research in Modern Psychiatry: Lessons Learned From Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Lawrence K Fung; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Imaging genomics: mapping the influence of genetics on brain structure and function.

Authors:  David C Glahn; Tomas Paus; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Insights into brain development from neurogenetic syndromes: evidence from fragile X syndrome, Williams syndrome, Turner syndrome and velocardiofacial syndrome.

Authors:  E Walter; P K Mazaika; A L Reiss
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  A quantitative comparison of NIRS and fMRI across multiple cognitive tasks.

Authors:  Xu Cui; Signe Bray; Daniel M Bryant; Gary H Glover; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Neural substrates of inhibitory control deficits in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Authors:  C A Montojo; M Jalbrzikowski; E Congdon; S Domicoli; C Chow; C Dawson; K H Karlsgodt; R M Bilder; C E Bearden
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 8.  The attentive brain: insights from developmental cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Dima Amso; Gaia Scerif
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 9.  Gene, brain, and behavior relationships in fragile X syndrome: evidence from neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Amy A Lightbody; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2009

10.  Fragile X and autism: Intertwined at the molecular level leading to targeted treatments.

Authors:  Randi Hagerman; Gry Hoem; Paul Hagerman
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 7.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.