Literature DB >> 17437085

Evaluation of BioCorkscrew and Bioknotless RC suture anchor rotator cuff repair fixation: an in vitro biomechanical study.

Jennifer Tucker Ammon1, John Nyland, Haw Chong Chang, Robert Burden, David N M Caborn.   

Abstract

This in vitro biomechanical study used cadaveric specimens to compare the rotator cuff repair fixation provided by BioCorkscrew and Bioknotless RC suture anchors. Three cm wide by 1-cm long full-thickness supraspinatus defects were repaired using either two BioCorkscrew suture anchors with combined vertical and horizontal mattress sutures (n = 7) or three Bioknotless RC suture anchors with simple sutures (n = 7). Therefore, the BioCorkscrew suture anchor group had two sutures per anchor (four total sutures), while the Bioknotless RC suture anchor group had one suture per anchor (three total sutures). Two-phase cyclic (5-100 N, 1,000 cycles and 5-180 N, 2,000 cycles) and load to failure tests (31 mm/s) were performed. Non-parametric statistics were used to compare group differences (P < 0.05). All of the BioCorkscrew group specimens (seven of seven) completed the two phase cyclic test regimen without failure or gapping >/= 5 mm, compared to only three of seven of the Bioknotless RC group (Fisher's Exact test = 0.03). Groups did not differ for repair site gapping during the 5-100 N cyclic test phase (Fisher's Exact test = 0.77), however more of the Bioknotless RC group displayed gapping >/= 5 mm during the 5-180 N cyclic test phase than the BioCorkscrew group (P = 0.02). The BioCorkscrew group also displayed greater yield load during load to failure testing (492.2 +/- 204 N vs. 296.4 +/- 155 N, P = 0.03). In this in vitro biomechanical study, the BioCorkscrew group with combined vertical and horizontal mattress sutures displayed greater cyclic test survival, less repair site gapping, and superior yield load compared to the Bioknotless RC group with simple sutures. These results in human cadaveric rotator cuff-humerus specimens suggest better immediate post-operative repair site strength and a reduced need for post-operative restrictions. Clinical studies are needed to determine how these rotator cuff repair modes withstand the forces of early rehabilitation and activities of daily living that potentially influence patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17437085     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0321-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  26 in total

1.  Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Alberto G Schneeberger; Andreas von Roll; Fabian Kalberer; Hilaire A C Jacob; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Rotator cuff repair. A biomechanical comparison of three techniques.

Authors:  Robert L Waltrip; Nigel Zheng; Jeffrey R Dugas; James R Andrews
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Rotator cuff repair: an ex vivo analysis of suture anchor repair techniques on initial load to failure.

Authors:  Craig A Cummins; Richard C Appleyard; Sabrina Strickland; Pieter-Stijn Haen; Shiyi Chen; George A C Murrell
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff.

Authors:  D T Harryman; L A Mack; K Y Wang; S E Jackins; M L Richardson; F A Matsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Full-thickness rotator cuff tears. A biomechanical comparison of suture versus bone anchor techniques.

Authors:  S C Reed; N Glossop; D J Ogilvie-Harris
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Optimizing arthroscopic knots.

Authors:  T D Loutzenheiser; D T Harryman; S W Yung; M P France; J A Sidles
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  The deadman theory of suture anchors: observations along a south Texas fence line.

Authors:  S S Burkhart
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Pull-out strength of suture anchors for rotator cuff and Bankart lesion repairs.

Authors:  A T Hecker; M Shea; J O Hayhurst; E R Myers; L W Meeks; W C Hayes
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Suture anchor failure strength--an in vivo study.

Authors:  F A Barber; P Cawley; J F Prudich
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  D F Gazielly; P Gleyze; C Montagnon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

1.  Novel ultrasound assisted suture anchor system using the BoneWelding® technology yields a comparable primary stability in osteopenic and healthy human humeri as a benchmark anchor.

Authors:  Mehmet F Güleçyüz; Christian Schröder; Matthias F Pietschmann; Stephanie Göbel; Mario Lehmann; Jörg Mayer; Andreas Ficklscherer; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 1.511

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.