Literature DB >> 17436400

Dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide and cisplatin (DCEP) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients.

M Dadacaridou1, X Papanicolaou, D Maltesas, C Megalakaki, P Patos, K Panteli, P Repousis, C Mitsouli-Mentzikof.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of DCEP (dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin), as third-line regimen in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients (11 men, 1 woman, aged 38-73 years, median 58) with relapsed or refractory MM received 28 cycles of DCEP. Eleven out of 12 patients had already failed 4-6 cycles of VAD (vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone), 7/12 had received 2 or more lines of prior therapy and one of them had high-dose therapy with stem cell support. Seven out of 12 patients were candidates for megatherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cells transplantation (ASCT) either as consolidation or as salvage treatment. Each cycle of DCEP consisted of cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m(2)/daily, cisplatin 15 mg/m(2)/daily and etoposide 40 mg/m(2)/daily as a 24h infusion, all three drugs administered on days 1-4; plus dexamethasone i.v. bolus 40 mg daily, days 1-4. The dose of cisplatin was adjusted in case of renal impairment. G-CSF was administered daily from day +5 to recovery. The course was repeated every 28 days or was delayed 5-10 days according to the patient's clinical condition.
RESULTS: The regimen was well tolerated with no major adverse reactions, except for grade 3 or 4 myelotoxicity of short duration. Responses were assessed using the EBMT criteria after the second cycle. Two out of 12 patients achieved complete remission (CR) and 5/12 partial remission (PR), while 5/12 had no response (NR). The overall response (OR) was 58.3% with a median response duration 9 months (range 4-36). Four patients proceeded to successful peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and transplantation.
CONCLUSIONS: DCEP is an effective and safe salvage treatment for relapsed or refractory MM patients which also offers the possibility for a successful peripheral blood stem cells collection in patients eligible for high-dose therapy and ASCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17436400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J BUON        ISSN: 1107-0625            Impact factor:   2.533


  11 in total

1.  A phase II study of V-BEAM as conditioning regimen before second auto-SCT for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  T-F Wang; M A Fiala; A F Cashen; G L Uy; C N Abboud; T Fletcher; N Wu; P Westervelt; J F DiPersio; K E Stockerl-Goldstein; R Vij
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 2.  Novel agents and new therapeutic approaches for treatment of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Roberto Ria; Antonia Reale; Angelo Vacca
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2014-06-26

3.  The Safety and Efficacy of Radiation Therapy with Concurrent Dexamethasone, Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, and Cisplatin-Based Systemic Therapy for Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Anthony D Nehlsen; Kunal K Sindhu; Erin Moshier; Joshua Richter; Shambavi Richard; Ajai Chari; Larysa Sanchez; Samir Parekh; Hearn Jay Cho; Sundar Jagannath; Kavita Dharmarajan
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2021-09-24

4.  Phase II trial of daratumumab with DCEP in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with extramedullary disease.

Authors:  Ja Min Byun; Chang-Ki Min; Kihyun Kim; Soo-Mee Bang; Je-Jung Lee; Jin Seok Kim; Sung-Soo Yoon; Youngil Koh
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2022-10-23       Impact factor: 23.168

Review 5.  Mitochondrial Superoxide Dismutase in Cisplatin-Induced Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Kranti A Mapuskar; Emily J Steinbach; Amira Zaher; Dennis P Riley; Robert A Beardsley; Jeffery L Keene; Jon T Holmlund; Carryn M Anderson; Diana Zepeda-Orozco; John M Buatti; Douglas R Spitz; Bryan G Allen
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-24

Review 6.  Common Chemical Inductors of Replication Stress:  Focus on Cell-Based Studies.

Authors:  Eva Vesela; Katarina Chroma; Zsofia Turi; Martin Mistrik
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2017-02-21

7.  Efficacy and Safety of Melphalan, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (MCD) as a Salvage Treatment for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Seung-Shin Lee; Je-Jung Lee
Journal:  Chonnam Med J       Date:  2019-01-25

Review 8.  Treatment May Be Harmful: Mechanisms/Prediction/Prevention of Drug-Induced DNA Damage and Repair in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Claire Gourzones; Caroline Bret; Jerome Moreaux
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Multiple Myeloma Treatment Strategies for Elderly Transplant-Ineligible Patients in Serbia.

Authors:  Đurđa Vukićević; Ursula Rochau; Aleksandar Savić; Monika Schaffner; Milica Jevđević; Igor Stojkov; Gaby Sroczynski; Wolfgang Willenbacher; Beate Jahn; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  Zdr Varst       Date:  2020-04-06

10.  Use of KRD-PACE as Salvage Therapy in Aggressive, Relapsed/Bortezomib-Refractory Extramedullary Multiple Myeloma: A Report of Two Cases and Literature Review.

Authors:  Ricardo D Parrondo; Vivek Roy; Taimur Sher; Victoria Alegria; Asher A Chanan-Khan; Sikander Ailawadhi
Journal:  Case Rep Hematol       Date:  2020-02-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.