Literature DB >> 17436336

Implementation of an adaptive group sequential design in a bioequivalence study.

Nibedita Bandyopadhyay1, Vladimir Dragalin.   

Abstract

The study design was a multi-center, multiple-dose, randomized, open-label, 2 x 2 crossover study in patients with advanced solid tumors. Each patient was randomized to receive the test formulation or the reference formulation of the drug. The primary objective of the study was to demonstrate the bioequivalence of the test formulation T relative to the reference formulation R. The primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were AUC and Cmax. Since there were different bioequivalence criteria, different endpoints, with different and highly variable coefficients of variation, an adaptive design with a stopping rule for early establishing the bioequivalence as well as early stopping for futility with a flexible information-based monitoring based on error spending approach was implemented to manage uncertainty in assumptions of variability and expected slow enrollment rates. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17436336     DOI: 10.1002/pst.252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  5 in total

1.  Adaptive optimal design for bridging studies with an application to population pharmacokinetic studies.

Authors:  Lee Kien Foo; Stephen Duffull
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Two-stage designs in bioequivalence trials.

Authors:  Helmut Schütz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  An insight into the properties of a two-stage design in bioequivalence studies.

Authors:  Vangelis Karalis; Panos Macheras
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  A "SMART" design for building individualized treatment sequences.

Authors:  H Lei; I Nahum-Shani; K Lynch; D Oslin; S A Murphy
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 18.561

5.  10th Anniversary of a Two-Stage Design in Bioequivalence. Why Has it Still Not Been Implemented?

Authors:  Michał Kaza; Alexander Sokolovskyi; Piotr J Rudzki
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.200

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.