Literature DB >> 17436289

Progranulin null mutations in both sporadic and familial frontotemporal dementia.

Isabelle Le Ber1, Julie van der Zee, Didier Hannequin, Ilse Gijselinck, Dominique Campion, Michèle Puel, Annie Laquerrière, Tim De Pooter, Agnès Camuzat, Marleen Van den Broeck, Bruno Dubois, François Sellal, Lucette Lacomblez, Martine Vercelletto, Catherine Thomas-Antérion, Bernard-François Michel, Véronique Golfier, Mira Didic, François Salachas, Charles Duyckaerts, Marc Cruts, Patrice Verpillat, Christine Van Broeckhoven, Alexis Brice.   

Abstract

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is the second most frequent type of neurodegenerative dementias. Mutations in the progranulin gene (GRN, PGRN) were recently identified in FTDU-17, an FTD subtype characterized by ubiquitin-immunoreactive inclusions and linkage to chromosome 17q21. We looked for PGRN mutations in a large series of 210 FTD patients (52 familial, 158 sporadic) to accurately evaluate the frequency of PGRN mutations in both sporadic and familial FTD, and FTD with associated motoneuron disease (FTD-MND), as well as to study the clinical phenotype of patients with a PGRN mutation. We identified nine novel PGRN null mutations in 10 index patients. The relative frequency of PGRN null mutations in FTD was 4.8% (10/210) and 12.8% (5/39) in pure familial forms. Interestingly, 5/158 (3.2%) apparently sporadic FTD patients carried a PGRN mutation, suggesting the possibility of de novo mutations or incomplete penetrance. In contrast, none of the 43 patients with FTD-MND had PGRN mutations, supporting that FTDU-17 and FTD-MND are genetically distinct. The clinical phenotype of PGRN mutation carriers was particular because of the wide range in onset age and the frequent occurrence of early apraxia (50%), visual hallucinations (30%), and parkinsonism (30%) during the course of the disease. This study supports that PGRN null mutations represent a more frequent cause of FTD than MAPT mutations (4.8% vs. 2.9%) but are not responsible for FTD-MND. It also demonstrates that half of the patients with a PGRN mutation in our series had no apparent family history of dementia. Taking this into account, genetic testing should be now considered more systematically, even in patients without obvious familial history of FTD. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17436289     DOI: 10.1002/humu.20520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  57 in total

Review 1.  Advances in understanding the molecular basis of frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Rosa Rademakers; Manuela Neumann; Ian R Mackenzie
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  New approaches to genetic counseling and testing for Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal degeneration.

Authors:  Jill S Goldman
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  An algorithm for genetic testing of frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Authors:  J S Goldman; R Rademakers; E D Huey; A L Boxer; R Mayeux; B L Miller; B F Boeve
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Clinical and genetic analyses of familial and sporadic frontotemporal dementia patients in Southern Italy.

Authors:  Rosa Capozzo; Celeste Sassi; Monia B Hammer; Simona Arcuti; Chiara Zecca; Maria R Barulli; Rosanna Tortelli; J Raphael Gibbs; Cynthia Crews; Davide Seripa; Francesco Carnicella; Claudia Dell'Aquila; Marco Rossi; Filippo Tamma; Francesco Valluzzi; Bruno Brancasi; Francesco Panza; Andrew B Singleton; Giancarlo Logroscino
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 21.566

5.  Novel progranulin mutation detected in 2 patients with FTLD.

Authors:  Lena Skoglund; Toshifumi Matsui; Stefanie H Freeman; Anders Wallin; Elin S Blom; Matthew P Frosch; John H Growdon; Bradley T Hyman; Lars Lannfelt; Martin Ingelsson; Anna Glaser
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.703

6.  FTLD-TDP With and Without GRN Mutations Cause Different Patterns of CA1 Pathology.

Authors:  Qinwen Mao; Xiaojing Zheng; Tamar Gefen; Emily Rogalski; Callen L Spencer; Rosa Rademakers; Angela J Fought; Missia Kohler; Sandra Weintraub; Haibin Xia; Marek-Marsel Mesulam; Eileen H Bigio
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 3.685

Review 7.  The genetics of frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Authors:  Rosa Rademakers; Mike Hutton
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 8.  Neurodegenerative dementia and parkinsonism.

Authors:  A Gabelle; F Portet; C Berr; J Touchon
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.075

9.  Partial deletions of the GRN gene are a cause of frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Authors:  Fabienne Clot; Anne Rovelet-Lecrux; Foudil Lamari; Sandrine Noël; Boris Keren; Agnès Camuzat; Agnès Michon; Ludmila Jornea; Béatrice Laudier; Anne de Septenville; Paola Caroppo; Dominique Campion; Cécile Cazeneuve; Alexis Brice; Eric LeGuern; Isabelle Le Ber
Journal:  Neurogenetics       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.660

10.  Contribution of ATXN2 intermediary polyQ expansions in a spectrum of neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Serena Lattante; Stéphanie Millecamps; Giovanni Stevanin; Sophie Rivaud-Péchoux; Carine Moigneu; Agnès Camuzat; Sandra Da Barroca; Emeline Mundwiller; Philippe Couarch; François Salachas; Didier Hannequin; Vincent Meininger; Florence Pasquier; Danielle Seilhean; Philippe Couratier; Véronique Danel-Brunaud; Anne-Marie Bonnet; Christine Tranchant; Eric LeGuern; Alexis Brice; Isabelle Le Ber; Edor Kabashi
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.