Literature DB >> 17436014

Nanoduct sweat testing for rapid diagnosis in newborns, infants and children with cystic fibrosis.

Marie-Claire Desax1, Roland A Ammann, Jürg Hammer, Martin H Schoeni, Jürg Barben.   

Abstract

Determination of chloride concentration in sweat is the current diagnostic gold standard for Cystic Fibrosis (CF). Nanoduct is a new analyzing system measuring conductivity which requires only 3 microliters of sweat and gives results within 30 minutes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the applicability of this system in a clinical setting of three children's hospitals and borderline results were compared with sweat chloride concentration. Over 3 years, 1,041 subjects were tested and in 946 diagnostic results were obtained. In 95 children, Nanoduct failed (9.1% failure rate), mainly due to failures in preterm babies and newborns. Assuming 59 mmol/L as an upper limit of normal conductivity, all our 46 CF patients were correctly diagnosed (sensitivity 100%, 95% CI: 93.1-100; negative predicted value 100% (95% CI: 99.6-100) and only 39 non CF's were false positive (39/900, 4.3%; specificity 95.7%, 95%CI: 94.2-96.9, positive predicted value 54.1% with a 95%CI: 43.4-65.0). Increasing the diagnostic limit to 80 mmol/L, the rate fell to 0.3% (3/900). CF patients had a median conductivity of 115 mmol/L; the non-CF a median of 37 mmol/L. In conclusion, the Nanoduct test is a reliable diagnostic tool for CF diagnosis: It has a failure rate comparable to other sweat tests and can be used as a simple bedside test for fast and reliable exclusion, diagnosis or suspicion of CF. In cases with borderline conductivity (60-80 mmol/L) other additional methods (determination of chloride and genotyping) are indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17436014     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-007-0485-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  15 in total

1.  Micro-flowcell conductometric sweat analysis for cystic fibrosis diagnosis.

Authors:  H L Webster; C G Quirante
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.057

2.  Reliability of sweat-testing by the Macroduct collection method combined with conductivity analysis in comparison with the classic Gibson and Cooke technique.

Authors:  G Mastella; G Di Cesare; A Borruso; L Menin; L Zanolla
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.299

3.  What is cystic fibrosis?

Authors:  Michael R Knowles; Peter R Durie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-08-08       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A test for concentration of electrolytes in sweat in cystic fibrosis of the pancreas utilizing pilocarpine by iontophoresis.

Authors:  L E GIBSON; R E COOKE
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Abnormal electrolyte composition of sweat in cystic fibrosis of the pancreas; clinical significance and relationship to the disease.

Authors:  P A DI SANT'AGNESE; R C DARLING; G A PERERA; E SHEA
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1953-11       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  Sweat-testing: a review of current technical requirements.

Authors:  M Beauchamp; L C Lands
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2005-06

Review 7.  The diagnosis of cystic fibrosis: a consensus statement. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Consensus Panel.

Authors:  B J Rosenstein; G R Cutting
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  The evaluation of a novel conductometric device for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Helen C Losty; Heather Wheatley; Iolo Doull
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.057

9.  Sweat-testing in preterm and full-term infants less than 6 weeks of age.

Authors:  Warren Eng; Vicky A LeGrys; Michael S Schechter; Matthew M Laughon; Pierre M Barker
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2005-07

10.  Conductivity determined by a new sweat analyzer compared with chloride concentrations for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Juerg Barben; Roland A Ammann; Agnes Metlagel; Martin H Schoeni
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.406

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Accessing analytes in biofluids for peripheral biochemical monitoring.

Authors:  Jason Heikenfeld; Andrew Jajack; Benjamin Feldman; Steve W Granger; Supriya Gaitonde; Gavi Begtrup; Benjamin A Katchman
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Australasian Guideline (2nd Edition): an Annex to the CLSI and UK Guidelines for the Performance of the Sweat Test for the Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  John Massie; Ronda Greaves; Michael Metz; Veronica Wiley; Peter Graham; Samantha Shepherd; Richard Mackay
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2017-11

3.  Wearable flexible sweat sensors for healthcare monitoring: a review.

Authors:  Michael Chung; Giuseppino Fortunato; Norbert Radacsi
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  One-year evaluation of a neonatal screening program for cystic fibrosis in Switzerland.

Authors:  Corina S Rueegg; Claudia E Kuehni; Sabina Gallati; Matthias Baumgartner; Toni Torresani; Juerg Barben
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Clinical evaluation of the Nanoduct sweat test system in the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis after newborn screening.

Authors:  Annette Vernooij-van Langen; Edward Dompeling; Jan-Bart Yntema; Bert Arets; Harm Tiddens; Gerard Loeber; Jeannette Dankert-Roelse
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Comparison of classic sweat test and crystallization test in diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Fatemeh Farahmand; Nooshin Sadjadei; Mohammad-Taghi Haghi-Ashtiani; Vajiheh Modaresi; Nima Rezaei; Bahar Pakseresht
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.364

Review 7.  Processing Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results for CF.

Authors:  Jürg Barben; Jane Chudleigh
Journal:  Int J Neonatal Screen       Date:  2020-03-25

Review 8.  Wearable Biosensors for Non-Invasive Sweat Diagnostics.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Yunsheng Fang; Jun Chen
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-23

9.  Nanoduct sweat conductivity measurements in 2664 patients: relationship to age, arterial blood gas, serum electrolyte profiles and clinical diagnosis.

Authors:  Rabia Gonul Sezer; Gokhan Aydemir; Abdullah Baris Akcan; Cem Paketci; Abdulbaki Karaoglu; Secil Aydinoz; Abdulkadir Bozaykut
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2013-01-11

Review 10.  Comprehensive Review on Wearable Sweat-Glucose Sensors for Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Hima Zafar; Asma Channa; Varun Jeoti; Goran M Stojanović
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.