Literature DB >> 17435544

Trocar-less instrumentation for laparoscopy: magnetic positioning of intra-abdominal camera and retractor.

Sangtae Park1, Richard A Bergs, Robert Eberhart, Linda Baker, Raul Fernandez, Jeffrey A Cadeddu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a novel laparoscopic system of moveable instruments that are positioned intra-abdominally and "locked" into place by external permanent magnets placed on the abdomen. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In conventional laparoscopy, multiple trocars are required because of the limited degrees of freedom of conventional instrumentation, and the limited working envelope (an inverted cone) created by the fulcrum motion around each port. While robotic systems can improve the number of degrees of freedom, they are restricted by even smaller working envelopes.
METHODS: A collaborative research group from the Department of Urology and the Automation & Robotics Research Institute of the University of Texas, Arlington built a prototype system of magnetically anchored instruments for trocar-less laparoscopy. The only design mandate was that the developed technology be able to pass into the abdomen through one existing 12-mm diameter trocar.
RESULTS: A transabdominal "magnetic anchoring and guidance system" (MAGS) platform was developed to incorporate instruments, retractors, and a controllable intra-abdominal camera. In vitro, the platform was able to anchor 375 and 147 g across porcine tissue 1.8 and 2.5 cm thick, respectively. The permanent magnet platforms were sufficiently strong to retract the porcine liver and securely anchor the camera. Its versatility was demonstrated by moving the camera to virtually any location in the peritoneum with no working envelope restrictions and the subsequent completion of porcine laparoscopic procedures with 2 trocars only.
CONCLUSIONS: Trocar-less laparoscopy using magnetically anchored instruments is feasible and may expand intracorporeal instrument manipulation substantially beyond current-day capability. The ability to reduce the number of trocars necessary for laparoscopic surgery has the potential to revolutionize surgical practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17435544      PMCID: PMC1877010          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000232518.01447.c7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  13 in total

1.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: is there a learning curve?

Authors:  K Shapiro; S Patel; Z Abdo; G Ferzli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Robot-assisted abdominal surgery.

Authors:  C N Gutt; T Oniu; A Mehrabi; A Kashfi; P Schemmer; M W Büchler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Laparoscopic splenectomy with the da Vinci robot.

Authors:  Johannes Bodner; Paolo Lucciarini; John Fish; Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch; Thomas Schmid
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.878

4.  Computer-assisted laparoscopic colon resection with the Da Vinci system: our first experiences.

Authors:  Chris Braumann; Christoph A Jacobi; Charalambos Menenakos; Ulrich Borchert; Jens C Rueckert; Joachim M Mueller
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  The center of the umbilicus as the Veress needle's entry site for laparoscopy.

Authors:  A Toth; M Graf
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 0.142

6.  Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Catherine J Mohr; Geoffrey S Nadzam; Myriam J Curet
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-08

7.  Symptomatic port-site hernia associated with a non-bladed trocar after laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Patrick S Lowry; Timothy D Moon; Anthony D'Alessandro; Stephen Y Nakada
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic aortic reconstruction for occlusive disease-a case report.

Authors:  Lois A Killewich; Lori L Cindrick-Pounds; Guillermo Gomez
Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.089

9.  Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.

Authors:  M S Dunker; A M Stiggelbout; R A van Hogezand; J Ringers; G Griffioen; W A Bemelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Significant abdominal wall hematoma from an umbilical port insertion.

Authors:  I Marcovici
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  46 in total

1.  A randomized comparison of laparoscopic, magnetically anchored, and flexible endoscopic cameras in performance and workload between laparoscopic and single-incision surgery.

Authors:  Nabeel A Arain; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Sara L Best; Thomas Roshek; Victoria Chang; Deborah C Hogg; Richard Bergs; Raul Fernandez; Erin M Webb; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Use of magnetic anchoring and guidance systems to facilitate single trocar laparoscopy.

Authors:  Sara L Best; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Maximizing coupling strength of magnetically anchored surgical instruments: how thick can we go?

Authors:  Sara L Best; Richard Bergs; Makram Gedeon; Juan Paramo; Raul Fernandez; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Magnetically anchored camera and percutaneous instruments maintain triangulation and improve cosmesis compared with single-site and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Nabeel A Arain; Luisangel Rondon; Deborah C Hogg; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Richard Bergs; Raul Fernandez; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Visual exposure using single-handed magnet-driven intra-abdominal wireless camera in minimal access surgery: is better than 30 degrees endoscope.

Authors:  Morkos Fakhry; Brendan Gallagher; Fernando Bello; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Completely transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments.

Authors:  Daniel J Scott; Shou-jiang Tang; Raul Fernandez; Richard Bergs; Mouza T Goova; Ilia Zeltser; Farid J Kehdy; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Transumbilical endoscopic surgery: a preliminary clinical report.

Authors:  Jiang Fan Zhu; Hai Hu; Ying Zhang Ma; Man Zhu Xu; Feng Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in kidney surgery: clinical experience and future perspectives.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Stavros Kontogiannis; Iason Kyriazis; Ioannis Georgiopoulos; Abdulrahman Al-Aown; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Providing more through less: current methods of retraction in SIMIS and NOTES cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Avraham Schlager; Abed Khalaileh; Noam Shussman; Ram Elazary; Andrei Keidar; Alon J Pikarsky; Avi Ben-Shushan; Oren Shibolet; Santiago Horgan; Mark Talamini; Gideon Zamir; Avraham I Rivkind; Yoav Mintz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Use of robotics in colon and rectal surgery.

Authors:  Michael J Pucci; Alec C Beekley
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.