OBJECTIVE: To explore the role of surgery of residual disease following a period of therapy with imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). METHODS: From January 2001 to June 2005, 159 patients with advanced/metastatic GIST were treated with imatinib mesylate at a single institution. As of June 2002, 38 patients were selected for surgery following a variable period of imatinib therapy. Twenty-seven patients were operated on while they were in response, 8 in progression, 3 for localized disease. Clinical, pathologic, and molecular features were assessed and are reported. RESULTS: Postsurgery PFS was 96% at 12 months and 69% at 24 months for responding patients, while it was nil at 12 months for progressing ones. Disease-specific survival at 12 months was 100% for responding patients and 60% for progressing ones. In responding cases, secondary progression was mainly related to postsurgical imatinib discontinuation, irrespective of pathologic or molecular variables. In progressing patients, secondary resistance was mainly related to acquired mutations. CONCLUSION: In advanced GIST patients who are responding to imatinib mesylate, the role of surgery is not formally demonstrated at the moment, but this option may well be considered investigational, or suitable for an individualized decision-making in the lack of evidence. In our series, patients progressing on imatinib mesylate did not seem to have any major benefit from surgery, although their number is low.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the role of surgery of residual disease following a period of therapy with imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). METHODS: From January 2001 to June 2005, 159 patients with advanced/metastatic GIST were treated with imatinib mesylate at a single institution. As of June 2002, 38 patients were selected for surgery following a variable period of imatinib therapy. Twenty-seven patients were operated on while they were in response, 8 in progression, 3 for localized disease. Clinical, pathologic, and molecular features were assessed and are reported. RESULTS: Postsurgery PFS was 96% at 12 months and 69% at 24 months for responding patients, while it was nil at 12 months for progressing ones. Disease-specific survival at 12 months was 100% for responding patients and 60% for progressing ones. In responding cases, secondary progression was mainly related to postsurgical imatinib discontinuation, irrespective of pathologic or molecular variables. In progressing patients, secondary resistance was mainly related to acquired mutations. CONCLUSION: In advanced GIST patients who are responding to imatinib mesylate, the role of surgery is not formally demonstrated at the moment, but this option may well be considered investigational, or suitable for an individualized decision-making in the lack of evidence. In our series, patients progressing on imatinib mesylate did not seem to have any major benefit from surgery, although their number is low.
Authors: H Joensuu; P J Roberts; M Sarlomo-Rikala; L C Andersson; P Tervahartiala; D Tuveson; S Silberman; R Capdeville; S Dimitrijevic; B Druker; G D Demetri Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-04-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elena Tamborini; Elisa Gabanti; M Stefania Lagonigro; Tiziana Negri; Silvana Pilotti; Marco A Pierotti; Sabrina Pricl Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: J-Y Blay; S Bonvalot; P Casali; H Choi; M Debiec-Richter; A P Dei Tos; J-F Emile; A Gronchi; P C W Hogendoorn; H Joensuu; A Le Cesne; J McClure; J Mac Clure; J Maurel; N Nupponen; I Ray-Coquard; P Reichardt; R Sciot; S Stroobants; M van Glabbeke; A van Oosterom; G D Demetri Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Courtney L Scaife; Kelly K Hunt; Shreyaskumar R Patel; Robert S Benjamin; Michael A Burgess; Lei L Chen; Jonathan Trent; A Kevin Raymond; Janice N Cormier; Peter W T Pisters; Raphael E Pollock; Barry W Feig Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Jaap Verweij; Paolo G Casali; John Zalcberg; Axel LeCesne; Peter Reichardt; Jean-Yves Blay; Rolf Issels; Allan van Oosterom; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Martine Van Glabbeke; Rossella Bertulli; Ian Judson Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Sep 25-Oct 1 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Christopher D M Fletcher; Jules J Berman; Christopher Corless; Fred Gorstein; Jerzy Lasota; B Jack Longley; Markku Miettinen; Timothy J O'Leary; Helen Remotti; Brian P Rubin; Barry Shmookler; Leslie H Sobin; Sharon W Weiss Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: M Debiec-Rychter; H Dumez; I Judson; B Wasag; J Verweij; M Brown; S Dimitrijevic; R Sciot; M Stul; H Vranck; M Scurr; A Hagemeijer; M van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Michael C Heinrich; Christopher L Corless; George D Demetri; Charles D Blanke; Margaret von Mehren; Heikki Joensuu; Laura S McGreevey; Chang-Jie Chen; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Brian J Druker; Beate Kiese; Burton Eisenberg; Peter J Roberts; Samuel Singer; Christopher D M Fletcher; Sandra Silberman; Sasa Dimitrijevic; Jonathan A Fletcher Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: George D Demetri; Margaret von Mehren; Cristina R Antonescu; Ronald P DeMatteo; Kristen N Ganjoo; Robert G Maki; Peter W T Pisters; Chandrajit P Raut; Richard F Riedel; Scott Schuetze; Hema M Sundar; Jonathan C Trent; Jeffrey D Wayne Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: M A Pantaleo; M Di Battista; F Catena; M Astorino; M Saponara; V Di Scioscio; D Santini; G Piazzi; P Castellucci; G Brandi; G Biasco Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2008-01-17 Impact factor: 4.553