Literature DB >> 17435059

A biomechanical comparison of initial fixation strength of 3 different methods of anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue graft tibial fixation: resistance to monotonic and cyclic loading.

Reed L Bartz1, Kory Mossoni, Jeffrey Tyber, John Tokish, Kenneth Gall, Patrick N Siparsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tibial fixation of soft tissue grafts continues to be problematic in the early postoperative period after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: No differences exist for resistance to slippage of soft tissue grafts fixed with CentraLoc, Intrafix, or 35-mm bioabsorbable interference screws. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Bovine tibia and hoof extensor tendons were divided into 3 matched groups with 12 tibia and 12 extensor tendons in each group. Within each group, 6 specimens underwent monotonic loading to failure (1 mm/s), and 6 underwent cyclic loading (10,000 cycles, 125-325 N, 1 Hz).
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were noted in mean load to failure or stiffness. The mean load to failure (and stiffness) for the 3 types of fixation were as follows: bioabsorbable interference screw, 631.6 +/- 130.1 N (88.17 +/- 6.79 N/mm); Intrafix, 644.3 +/- 195.2 N (81.65 +/- 16.5 N/mm); and CentraLoc, 791.1 +/- 72.7 N (77.89 +/- 7.07 N/mm). The slippage rates under cyclic loading for the 3 types of fixation were bioabsorbable interference screw, 0.336 +/- 0.074 microm/cycle; Intrafix, 27.2 +/- 31.6 microm/cycle; and CentraLoc, 0.0355 +/- 0.0046 microm/cycle. In this model, CentraLoc proved statistically superior in resistance to cyclic loading compared with the bioabsorbable interference screw (P < .05) and Intrafix (P < .0001). The bioabsorbable interference screw proved statistically superior to Intrafix in resistance to cyclic loading (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: In this bovine model, CentraLoc and bioabsorbable interference screws provided superior resistance to cyclic loading compared with Intrafix. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CentraLoc and bioabsorbable interference screws showed superior resistance to cyclic loading, which may indicate an increased resistance to clinical failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17435059     DOI: 10.1177/0363546507301881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  6 in total

1.  Elongation of simulated whipstitch post anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tibial fixation after cyclic loading.

Authors:  Chadwick C Prodromos; Aaron Hecker; Brian Joyce; Susan Finkle; Kelvin Shi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A comparison of four tibial-fixation systems in hamstring-graft anterior ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Henri Robert; Mark Bowen; Guillaume Odry; Michel Collette; Xavier Cassard; Hubert Lanternier; Thierry De Polignac
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-10

3.  Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Tibial Fixation Technique Versus Interference Screw Fixation for ACL Reconstruction Using Soft Tissue Grafts.

Authors:  Tinghan Sun; Hangzhou Zhang
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-25

4.  Investigation of Hamstring Tendon Graft Fixation for the Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament using Interference Screw Merely or in Combination with Supplementary Staple: A Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sayed Hamid Mousavi; Omid Masoumi; Hossein Akbariaghdam; Ghasem Mohammadsharifi
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2020-09-30

5.  COMPLICATIONS OF THE SCREW/WASHER TIBIAL FIXATION TECHNIQUE FOR KNEE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION.

Authors:  Alexandre Almeida; Gilberto Roveda; Márcio Rangel Valin; Nayvaldo Couto de Almeida; Vanderlei Sartor; Soraya Melina Alves
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-12

6.  A biomechanical comparison of all-inside cruciate ligament graft preparation techniques.

Authors:  Colter R Wichern; Kathryn C Skoglund; Joseph G O'Sullivan; Anora K Burwell; Joseph T Nguyen; Andrea Herzka; Jacqueline M Brady
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2018-10-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.