Literature DB >> 17433603

Shared decision making: the reliability of the OPTION scale in Italy.

Claudia Goss1, Silvia Fontanesi, Maria Angela Mazzi, Lidia Del Piccolo, Michela Rimondini, Glyn Elwyn, Christa Zimmermann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide psychometric characteristics of the Italian language version of the OPTION scale and descriptive statistics on patients' involvement. The OPTION scale assesses the extent to which clinicians involve patients in therapeutic decisions. The English language version has a Cohen's kappa score for individual items ranging from 0.45 to 0.98 and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the total score of 0.77.
METHODS: Six male GPs provided 235 audiotaped consultations with consecutive patients who had attended for a new illness episode over a 2-month period. Thirty interviews were rated by two raters to assess inter- and intra rater as well as test-retest reliability of the Italian language version of the OPTION scale. Based on the whole sample, Cronbach's alpha and an exploratory factor analysis were performed to assess internal validity and to determine factor loadings.
RESULTS: Cohen's kappa values were comprised between 0.29 and 0.73, the ICC at test and retest was 0.85 and 0.81 and Cronbach's alpha 0.82. The ratings for each OPTION item showed a skewed distribution: the majority of scores (>70%) were between 0 (behaviour absent) and 2 (minimum skill level).
CONCLUSION: The reliability indices were satisfactory and similar to those reported for the original OPTION. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: OPTION can be used for both teaching purposes and research, as well as for future cross-national comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17433603     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Shared decision-making in acute psychiatric medicine : Contraindication or a challenge?]

Authors:  S Heres; J Hamann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  The quality of instruments to assess the process of shared decision making: A systematic review.

Authors:  Fania R Gärtner; Hanna Bomhof-Roordink; Ian P Smith; Isabelle Scholl; Anne M Stiggelbout; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Reliability and validity of the German version of the OPTION scale.

Authors:  Oliver Hirsch; Heidemarie Keller; Meike Müller-Engelmann; Monika Heinzel Gutenbrunner; Tanja Krones; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument.

Authors:  Nicolas Couët; Sophie Desroches; Hubert Robitaille; Hugues Vaillancourt; Annie Leblanc; Stéphane Turcotte; Glyn Elwyn; France Légaré
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  [Patient involvement in decision making in primary care clinics: development of a measuring tool].

Authors:  Roger Ruiz Moral; Lucía Peralta Munguia; Luis Angel Pérula de Torres; Enrique Gavilán Moral; José Ramón Loayssa Lara
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 1.137

6.  The role of physician-patient communication in promoting patient-participatory decision making.

Authors:  Roger Ruiz-Moral
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Making decisions about treatment for young people diagnosed with depressive disorders: a qualitative study of clinicians' experiences.

Authors:  Magenta B Simmons; Sarah E Hetrick; Anthony F Jorm
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Right choice, right time: Evaluation of an online decision aid for youth depression.

Authors:  Magenta B Simmons; Aurora Elmes; Joanne E McKenzie; Lyndal Trevena; Sarah E Hetrick
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  INvolvement of breast CAncer patients during oncological consultations: a multicentre randomised controlled trial--the INCA study protocol.

Authors:  Claudia Goss; Alberto Ghilardi; Giuseppe Deledda; Chiara Buizza; Alessandro Bottacini; Lidia Del Piccolo; Michela Rimondini; Federica Chiodera; Maria Angela Mazzi; Mario Ballarin; Irene Bighelli; Maria Grazia Strepparava; Annamaria Molino; Elena Fiorio; Rolando Nortilli; Chiara Caliolo; Serena Zuliani; Alessandra Auriemma; Federica Maspero; Edda Lucia Simoncini; Fulvio Ragni; Richard Brown; Christa Zimmermann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Decision-making in multiple sclerosis consultations in Italy: third observer and patient assessments.

Authors:  Erika Pietrolongo; Andrea Giordano; Monica Kleinefeld; Paolo Confalonieri; Alessandra Lugaresi; Carla Tortorella; Maura Pugliatti; Davide Radice; Claudia Goss; Christoph Heesen; Alessandra Solari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.