BACKGROUND: Cardiotoxity is a side-effect of cancer treatment with anthracycline that is currently monitored by measuring the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by gated equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography (RNV). We hypothesized that BNP measurements could replace, at least in part, the RNV examinations. Therefore, we studied whether BNP could be used, alone or in combination with RNV, in the monitoring of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxity. METHODS: A total of 333 patients undergoing anthracycline treatment had LVEF and BNP concentration measured. Of these, 73 had more than one determination. In the 333 patients we compared the BNP concentration to LVEF, and further, for the 73 patient with more than one examination, we compared the changes in LVEF and BNP. We evaluated different BNP cut-off values for detection of LVEF below 0.50, 0.45 and 0.40, respectively. RESULTS: Using LVEF below 0.50 and a BNP cut-off value of 100 pg ml(-1) it was possible to save 90% of the RNV determinations with the cost of overlooking 68% of the patients with reduced LVEF. Using LVEF below 0.45 and a BNP cut-off value of 30 pg ml(-1) it was possible to save 59% of the RNV determination, with the cost of overlooking 15% of the patients with reduced LVEF. CONCLUSION: BNP cannot safely be used as an alternative to RNV determination of LVEF in patient undergoing anthracycline treatment if the standard limit of an LVEF of 0.50 was used. However, if only lower LVEF were to be detected BNP could be used to save RNV determinations.
BACKGROUND:Cardiotoxity is a side-effect of cancer treatment with anthracycline that is currently monitored by measuring the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by gated equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography (RNV). We hypothesized that BNP measurements could replace, at least in part, the RNV examinations. Therefore, we studied whether BNP could be used, alone or in combination with RNV, in the monitoring of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxity. METHODS: A total of 333 patients undergoing anthracycline treatment had LVEF and BNP concentration measured. Of these, 73 had more than one determination. In the 333 patients we compared the BNP concentration to LVEF, and further, for the 73 patient with more than one examination, we compared the changes in LVEF and BNP. We evaluated different BNP cut-off values for detection of LVEF below 0.50, 0.45 and 0.40, respectively. RESULTS: Using LVEF below 0.50 and a BNP cut-off value of 100 pg ml(-1) it was possible to save 90% of the RNV determinations with the cost of overlooking 68% of the patients with reduced LVEF. Using LVEF below 0.45 and a BNP cut-off value of 30 pg ml(-1) it was possible to save 59% of the RNV determination, with the cost of overlooking 15% of the patients with reduced LVEF. CONCLUSION:BNP cannot safely be used as an alternative to RNV determination of LVEF in patient undergoing anthracycline treatment if the standard limit of an LVEF of 0.50 was used. However, if only lower LVEF were to be detected BNP could be used to save RNV determinations.
Authors: Xiang Lu; Yingying Zhao; Caiping Chen; Chao Han; Li Xue; Dan Xing; Ou Huang; Min Tao Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Lena Hinrichs; Simone Maria Mrotzek; Raluca-Ileana Mincu; Julia Pohl; Alina Röll; Lars Michel; Amir Abbas Mahabadi; Fadi Al-Rashid; Matthias Totzeck; Tienush Rassaf Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 5.810