Literature DB >> 1743272

Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, fiscal year 1990.

R B Gold1, D Daley.   

Abstract

In FY 1990, the federal and state governments spent $504 million to provide contraceptive services and supplies, according to results of a survey of state health, social services and Medicaid agencies conducted by The Alan Guttmacher Institute. Medicaid accounted for 38 percent of all public funds spent on contraceptive services, Title X provided 22 percent, and two federal block-grant programs--Social Services and Maternal and Child Health--together were responsible for 12 percent of public expenditures. State governments accounted for the remaining 28 percent of public funding. Although public expenditures for contraceptive services have risen by $154 million over the past decade, when inflation is taken into account, expenditures have actually fallen by one-third. Since 1980, the proportion of public contraceptive expenditures contributed by Title X has been cut virtually in half, while the proportion contributed by state governments has nearly doubled. When inflation is taken into account, Title X expenditures for contraceptive services have fallen by almost two-thirds since 1980. The federal and state governments together spent $95 million to subsidize sterilization services in 1990, and $65 million to provide abortion services. The federal government was the major source of funding for sterilization services but provided less than one percent of the cost of abortion services. Because of changes over time in survey methodology and the difficulties some states had in separating out expenditures by type of care, these data are approximations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Medicaid; Title X; Abortion, Induced--cost; Americas; Contraception--cost; Contraceptive Distribution--cost; Data Analysis; Developed Countries; Distributional Activities; Economic Factors; Education; Educational Activities; Expenditures--changes; Expenditures--statistics; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs--changes; Family Planning Programs--cost; Fertility Control, Postconception; Financial Activities; Financing, Government; Funds; Government Sponsored Programs--cost; Medical Assistance, Title 19--cost; North America; Northern America; Organization And Administration; Program Activities; Programs; Public Assistance; Research Methodology; Resource Allocation; Service Statistics; Sterilization, Sexual--cost; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1743272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect        ISSN: 0014-7354


  5 in total

1.  Wanting children.

Authors:  C A Miller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The impact of state-level restrictions on abortion.

Authors:  K J Meier; D P Haider-Markel; A J Stanislawski; D R McFarlane
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1996-08

3.  The ramifications of induced abortion. 2. Increases in unwanted births: origins and consequences.

Authors:  B Ferguson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  State family planning and abortion expenditures: their effect on public health.

Authors:  K J Meier; D R McFarlane
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  The Economic Burden of Abortion and Its Complication Treatment Cares: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maryam Soleimani Movahed; Saeed Husseini Barghazan; Fariba Askari; Morteza Arab Zozani
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2020-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.