Literature DB >> 17430316

Low concentrations of inhaled nitric oxide do not improve oxygenation in patients with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

M N Melsom1, T Flatebø, G Nicolaysen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by airway narrowing that is most frequently inhomogeneously distributed. Ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) mismatch may explain much of the hypoxemia in patients with advanced disease. A potential treatment strategy would be to redistribute blood flow to well-ventilated lung regions in order to decrease V/Q mismatch. It has been suggested that inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in physiologic concentrations ( approximately 100 p.p.b.) could act as a local vasodilating agent in well-ventilated lung regions. To test this, we included 10 volunteer patients with very severe COPD in this study.
METHODS: NO was mixed with O(2) and N(2) and administered through a face mask. The partial pressure of inspired oxygen (P(i)o(2)) did not change by more than +/- 0.5 kPa from the room air value. NO was given in 15-min periods at concentrations of approximately 0, approximately 40, approximately 400, approximately 4000 and approximately 40,000 p.p.b. (random order). During each NO exposure, arterial blood gases, methemoglobin and systemic blood pressure were measured every fifth minute.
RESULTS: None of the patients reported subjective effects of the different gas mixtures. The partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (P(a)o(2)) did not change by more than +/- 1.2 kPa from the baseline value, and there was no correlation between the change in P(a)o(2) and iNO concentration. No significant changes were found in blood pressure or methemoglobin during iNO.
CONCLUSION: No significant effect of iNO at concentrations up to 40,000 p.p.b. in inspired gas was found on arterial blood gases. This indicates that neither low nor high concentrations of iNO improve oxygenation in patients with very severe COPD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17430316     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01277.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  4 in total

Review 1.  Inhaled pulmonary vasodilators: a narrative review.

Authors:  Kai Liu; Huan Wang; Shen-Ji Yu; Guo-Wei Tu; Zhe Luo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

Review 2.  Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction.

Authors:  J T Sylvester; Larissa A Shimoda; Philip I Aaronson; Jeremy P T Ward
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 46.500

3.  Effect of indacaterol/glycopyrronium on ventilation and perfusion in COPD: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Dave Singh; Jim M Wild; Dinesh Saralaya; Rod Lawson; Helen Marshall; Jonathan Goldin; Matthew S Brown; Konstantinos Kostikas; Kristin Belmore; Robert Fogel; Francesco Patalano; Anton Drollmann; Surendra Machineni; Ieuan Jones; Denise Yates; Hanns-Christian Tillmann
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 4.  Treatment of respiratory failure in COPD.

Authors:  Stephan Budweiser; Rudolf A Jörres; Michael Pfeifer
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2008
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.