Literature DB >> 17430313

Stroke volume variation during hemorrhage and after fluid loading: impact of different tidal volumes.

J Renner1, E Cavus, P Meybohm, P Tonner, M Steinfath, J Scholz, G Lutter, B Bein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that stroke volume variation (SVV) may be used to assess preload and fluid responsiveness. It is currently under debate, if SVV reliably displays changes in preload during ventilation with clinically used tidal volumes. This study was designed to evaluate whether the predictive value of SVV depends on the tidal volume applied particularly during acute changes of preload.
METHODS: We studied 14 anesthetized pigs (35 +/- 2 kg) during changing tidal volumes (5, 10 and 15 ml/kg) at normovolemia (BL), after removal of 500 cc of blood (Hypo) and after retransfusion plus additional 500 cc 6% hydroxyethyl starch (Hyper). SVV was recorded continuously, and global end-diastolic volume (GEDV) was obtained by transpulmonary thermodilution at each experimental stage.
RESULTS: GEDV changed significantly comparing the different experimental stages (P < 0.0001). During ventilation with 5 ml/kg, SVV did not change significantly at the different loading conditions. In contrast, during ventilation with both 10 and 15 ml/kg, SVV changed significantly comparing hemorrhage to fluid loading. However, at 15 ml/kg SVV was above the recommended value throughout the experiment.
CONCLUSIONS: In this animal model, SVV was not sensitive to acute changes in preload during ventilation with a tidal volume of 5 ml/kg. Moreover, ventilation with high tidal volume may suggest volume loading even after sufficient volume resuscitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17430313     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01282.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  8 in total

1.  Can we use pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with ARDS?

Authors:  Jean-Yves Lefrant; Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-04-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Interactions between respiration and systemic hemodynamics. Part II: practical implications in critical care.

Authors:  François Feihl; Alain F Broccard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Cardiopulmonary interactions and volume status assessment.

Authors:  Alain F Broccard
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Arterial Pressure Variation in Elective Noncardiac Surgery: Identifying Reference Distributions and Modifying Factors.

Authors:  Michael R Mathis; Samuel A Schechtman; Milo C Engoren; Amy M Shanks; Aleda Thompson; Sachin Kheterpal; Kevin K Tremper
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Influences of different vasopressors on stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation.

Authors:  Ran Kong; Yi Liu; Weidong Mi; Qiang Fu
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Karim Lakhal; Stephan Ehrmann; Dalila Benzekri-Lefèvre; Isabelle Runge; Annick Legras; Pierre-François Dequin; Emmanuelle Mercier; Michel Wolff; Bernard Régnier; Thierry Boulain
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  The impact of inspiratory pressure on stroke volume variation and the evaluation of indexing stroke volume variation to inspiratory pressure under various preload conditions in experimental animals.

Authors:  Yu Kawazoe; Tsuyoshi Nakashima; Toshie Iseri; Chiaki Yonetani; Kentaro Ueda; Yuka Fujimoto; Seiya Kato
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Comparison of the non-invasive Nexfin® monitor with conventional methods for the measurement of arterial blood pressure in moderate risk orthopaedic surgery patients.

Authors:  Felix Balzer; Marit Habicher; Michael Sander; Julian Sterr; Stephanie Scholz; Aarne Feldheiser; Michael Müller; Carsten Perka; Sascha Treskatsch
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 1.671

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.