Literature DB >> 17429788

Liberal indications for minimally invasive oxford unicondylar arthroplasty provide rapid functional recovery and pain relief.

Keith R Berend1, Adolph V Lombardi.   

Abstract

The Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) was recently approved for implantation in America. Recovery was evaluated and the efficacy of a musculoskeletal hospital was addressed for an initial group of patients who underwent medial compartment UKA with the Oxford device. Between October 2004 and December 2005, 142 medial UKAs were performed in 125 patients and included 11 simultaneous and six staged bilateral UKA procedures, and one simultaneous UKA/TKA procedure. The patients' ages averaged 62 (range: 41-87) years, weight 90 kg, and body mass index (BMI) 31.6 kg/m(2). Sixty-one UKAs were performed in obese patients (BMI >32). The length of stay averaged 1.3 days. In 121 (97%) cases, patients were discharged directly to home. In 23 (18%) cases, home health physical therapy was used. Outpatient physical therapy was used in 95 (76%) cases. Only four (3%) patients required a skilled nursing or post-discharge rehabilitation stay. Five reoperations were required: one revision to TKA for tibial plateau fracture, one revision to TKA for tibial loosening, one radical debridement and staged reimplantation of primary TKA for sepsis, and two arthroscopic procedures (one retained cement, and one synovitis). The average arc of motion at initial six-week follow up was 116 degrees , with 56% of knees having greater than 120 degrees and 82% more than 110 degrees . Absent, or only mild, pain was reported in 85% of knees. Seventy-five percent of patients had good or excellent Knee Society scores by six weeks postoperatively. UKA provides excellent early function and pain relief with rapid recovery when performed at a specialty musculoskeletal hospital. Early discharge appears to be safe and does not transfer the burden of care to other facilities or home health rehabilitation services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17429788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Technol Int        ISSN: 1090-3941


  13 in total

1.  The Oxford unicompartmental knee fails at a high rate in a high-volume knee practice.

Authors:  William C Schroer; C Lowry Barnes; Paul Diesfeld; Angela LeMarr; Rachel Ingrassia; Diane J Morton; Mary Reedy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Common causes of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a single-centre analysis of four hundred and seventy one cases.

Authors:  Mustafa Citak; Kathrin Dersch; Atul F Kamath; Carl Haasper; Thorsten Gehrke; Daniel Kendoff
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The Repicci II® unicondylar knee arthroplasty: 9-year survivorship and function.

Authors:  Turlough O'Donnell; Michael J Neil
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A Cohort Study Predicts Better Functional Outcomes and Equivalent Patient Satisfaction Following UKR Compared with TKR.

Authors:  Douglas J Matthews; Fahad Siddique Hossain; Shelain Patel; Fahad S Haddad
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-01-24

5.  Comparison of outpatient versus inpatient total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Frank R Kolisek; Mike S McGrath; Nenette M Jessup; Eric A Monesmith; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Christopher A Walter; Jorge Aziz-Jacobo; Nicholas A Cheney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  FACTORS AFFECTING THE FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF OXFORD PHASE 3 UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY.

Authors:  Ayşe Esin Polat; Bariş Polat; Tahsin Gürpinar; Bariş Peker; Tolga Tüzüner
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 8.  The Influence of Obesity on Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hannah Jia Hui Ng; Wei Jie Loke; Wee Liang Hao James
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-11

9.  Reduced hospital stay, morphine consumption, and pain intensity with local infiltration analgesia after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Per Essving; Kjell Axelsson; Jill Kjellberg; Orjan Wallgren; Anil Gupta; Anders Lundin
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Minimally invasive surgery did not improve outcome compared to conventional surgery following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using local infiltration analgesia: a randomized controlled trial with 40 patients.

Authors:  Per Essving; Kjell Axelsson; Lena Otterborg; Henrik Spännar; Anil Gupta; Anders Magnuson; Anders Lundin
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.