Literature DB >> 17429559

A prospective, randomized controlled trial of the use of an anal purse-string suture to decrease contamination during pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Daniel H Biller1, Nathan L Guerette, James F Bena, G Willy Davila.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of an anal purse-string suture to prevent contamination of the operative field during vaginal surgery. Patients undergoing vaginal surgery involving the posterior compartment were enrolled to receive a purse-string suture closing the anus (group 1) or to not receive the suture (group 2). Perineal/perianal cultures were performed after sterile preparation and at conclusion of surgery. The primary outcome measure was gross fecal contamination. Secondary outcomes were results of perineal cultures. Continuous and ordinal variables were compared between groups using Wilcoxon rank sum tests, while comparisons of binary variables were performed using exact unconditional tests. Forty (40) patients were randomized. There were no significant differences in the two groups including age (P = 0.95), parity (P = 0.40), operative time (P = 0.75), and estimated blood loss (P = 0.81). Gross contamination rates were 0/40 (0%) for group 1 and 5/19 (26.3%) for group 2 (P = 0.015). Contamination by fecal flora occurred in 2/20 (10%) for group 1 and in 5/20 (25%) for group 2 (P = 0.27). No wound infections, graft erosions, or healing abnormalities were noted in either group. An anal purse-string suture is an effective way of reducing fecal contamination of the sterile field when performing vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17429559     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-007-0370-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  7 in total

Review 1.  Management of genital prolapse.

Authors:  Ranee Thakar; Stuart Stanton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-25

Review 2.  The use and misuse of prosthetic materials in reconstructive pelvic surgery: does the evidence support our surgical practice?

Authors:  Mark D Walters
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2003-12-02

3.  Randomized clinical trial of suture repair, polypropylene mesh or autodermal hernioplasty for incisional hernia.

Authors:  M Korenkov; S Sauerland; M Arndt; L Bograd; E A M Neugebauer; H Troidl
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  Ingrid Nygaard; Catherine Bradley; Debra Brandt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  Peter L Dwyer; Barry A O'Reilly
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Bacterial colony counts during vaginal surgery.

Authors:  Patrick Culligan; Michael Heit; Linda Blackwell; Miles Murphy; Carol A Graham; James Snyder
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.