Literature DB >> 17429101

Effects of a treatment gap during adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer: results of International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trials 13-93 and 14-93.

Marco Colleoni, Shari Gelber, Edda Simoncini, Olivia Pagani, Richard D Gelber, Karen N Price, Monica Castiglione-Gertsch, Alan S Coates, Aron Goldhirsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) conducted two complementary randomized trials to assess whether a treatment-free gap during adjuvant chemotherapy influenced outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1993 to 1999, IBCSG Trials 13-93 and 14-93 enrolled 2215 premenopausal and postmenopausal women with axillary node-positive, operable breast cancer. All patients received cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan, C) plus either doxorubicin (Adriamycin, A) or epirubicin (E) for four courses followed immediately (No Gap) or after a 16-week delay (Gap) by classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) for three courses. The median follow-up was 7.7 years.
RESULTS: The Gap and No-Gap groups had similar disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). No identified subgroup showed a statistically significant difference, but exploratory subgroup analysis noted a trend towards decreased DFS for Gap compared with No Gap for women with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors not receiving tamoxifen, especially evident during the first 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: A 16-week gap between adjuvant AC/EC and CMF provided no benefit and may have increased early recurrence rates in patients with ER-negative tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17429101     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  4 in total

1.  Classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy is more effective in triple-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from two randomized trials of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Marco Colleoni; Bernard F Cole; Giuseppe Viale; Meredith M Regan; Karen N Price; Eugenio Maiorano; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Diana Crivellari; Richard D Gelber; Aron Goldhirsch; Alan S Coates; Barry A Gusterson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Current advances in endocrine therapy options for premenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Mary L Gemignani; David J Hetzel
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Prognosis of medullary breast cancer: analysis of 13 International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trials.

Authors:  J Huober; S Gelber; A Goldhirsch; A S Coates; G Viale; C Öhlschlegel; K N Price; R D Gelber; M M Regan; B Thürlimann
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  When do patient reported quality of life indicators become prognostic in breast cancer?

Authors:  Chee Khoon Lee; Malcolm Hudson; John Simes; Karin Ribi; Jürg Bernhard; Alan S Coates
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.186

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.