Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for detection of immunoglobulin M antibodies to West Nile virus and the importance of background subtraction in detecting nonspecific reactivity.

Since the introduction of West Nile virus (WNV) in the United States in 1999, several assays have become commercially available to detect antibodies against WNV. Capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the detection of WNV-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for clinical testing and are available from Focus Diagnostics and PanBio, Inc. The Focus Diagnostics IgM capture ELISA utilizes a background subtraction protocol in order to detect nonspecific reactivity due to rheumatoid factor, heterophile antibodies, or other interfering substances. A background subtraction procedure is not currently recommended for the PanBio IgM capture ELISA. In previous experiments, we determined the agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of the PanBio first-generation IgM capture ELISA compared to an immunofluorescence assay and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's IgM capture ELISA. The PanBio assay has since been reformulated to improve the specificity of the assay. We evaluated the reformulated PanBio assay with and without an antigen subtraction procedure and compared the results to the Focus IgM capture ELISA. Agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of the PanBio assay were, respectively, 85%, 95%, and 76% without the subtraction protocol and 94%, 95%, and 93% with the subtraction protocol. In general, when the subtraction protocol was applied to the PanBio IgM capture ELISA, there was a reduction in some, but not all, false-positive results. We suggest that all WNV IgM assays be standardized with a procedure such as background subtraction to eliminate nonspecific reactivity that may cause false-positive results.