Literature DB >> 17428752

Double-pedicle abdominal perforator free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction: new horizons in microsurgical tissue transfer to the breast.

Moustapha Hamdi1, Dana K Khuthaila, Koenraad Van Landuyt, Nathalie Roche, Stan Monstrey.   

Abstract

The DIEAP (deep inferior epigastric artery perforator) flap is a suitable option for breast reconstruction resulting in excellent aesthetic outcome, and minimal donor site morbidity. Contraindications for use of the DIEAP flap may include previous abdominal liposuction and/or surgery, or lack of abdominal tissue. The purpose of this paper is to describe options of using abdominal perforator flaps, based on double-pedicle techniques, despite these contraindications. A retrospective evaluation was carried out on a series of 16 patients who required abdominal double-pedicle free perforator flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction since June 2002. The indications were multiple abdominal scars, previous abdominal liposuction and thin patients in five, three and eight cases, respectively. Preoperative mapping of the vascular network was done using Duplex and/or multi-detector CT scan imaging. Clinical evaluation of medical charts was done regarding patients' characteristics, surgical techniques, ischaemia/total operative time and complications. A clinical evaluation was done on all patients with average follow up of 15 months. Fat necrosis was investigated clinically and by mammogram examination. Different microsurgical techniques were performed to provide enough blood supply to the requested flaps: Perforator (P) to contralateral Deep Inferior Epigastric (DIE) anastomosis (P/DIEAP), in two patients; bilateral DIE vessels (DIEAP/DIEAP) in seven patients; and DIE with SIE (superficial inferior epigastric) vessels in seven patients (DIEAP/SIEA). One pedicle was always anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels. The second pedicle was anastomosed end-to-end to a side branch of the DIE or end-to-side with the DIE pedicle in 13 cases. The thoracodorsal vessels were used as recipient vessels for the second pedicle in three cases. Average operative time was 6h 30min (range 5h 30min-8h). All 16 flaps survived and fat necrosis occurred in one case. The harvesting of perforator free flaps may be contraindicated in some patients, however they are still a feasible option as long as the vessels to the skin are present. Preoperative planning combined with high expertise in microsurgical techniques are the key points in the high success rate in these difficult cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17428752     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  12 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of fluorescent angiography, computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for planning autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

2.  Using a Single Internal Mammary Artery as Retrograde and Antegrade Flow for Bilateral Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Reconstruction: A Case Report.

Authors:  Richard Tyrell; Rachelle Y Leong; Sandeep A Sathyanarayana; Peter Korn; Alan S Kadison
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2014-09-26

3.  An algorithmic approach to total breast reconstruction with free tissue transfer.

Authors:  Seong Cheol Yu; Grant M Kleiber; David H Song
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05-16

4.  Indocyanine green-based fluorescent angiography in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Matthew Griffiths; Michael P Chae; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

5.  Increasing options in autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction: four free flaps for 'stacked' bilateral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Warren Matthew Rozen; Nakul Gamanlal Patel; Venkat V Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

6.  Stacked and bipedicled abdominal free flaps for breast reconstruction: considerations for shaping.

Authors:  Nakul Gamanlal Patel; Warren Matthew Rozen; Whitney T H Chow; Muhammad Chowdhry; Edmund Fitzgerald O'Connor; Hrsikesa Sharma; Matthew Griffiths; Venkat V Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

7.  Four-flap Breast Reconstruction: Bilateral Stacked DIEP and PAP Flaps.

Authors:  James L Mayo; Robert J Allen; Alireza Sadeghi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-06-05

8.  Acellular Dermal Matrix Versus Inferior Deepithelialized Flap Breast Reconstruction: Equivalent Outcomes, with Increased Cost.

Authors:  Heidi H Hon; Ronnie N Mubang; Brian D Wernick; Samuel F Freedman; Jill C Stoltzfus; Lino F Miele; Stanislaw P Stawicki; W Michael Morrissey
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-06-28

9.  Decision Making in Double-Pedicled DIEP and SIEA Abdominal Free Flap Breast Reconstructions: An Algorithmic Approach and Comprehensive Classification.

Authors:  Charles M Malata; Nicholas G Rabey
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-10-26

10.  What's the remedy for the distal necrosis of DIEP flap, better venous drain or more arterial supply?

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Tingliang Wang; Jiao Wei; Jinguang He; Tao Wang; Ying Liu; Hua Xu; Jiasheng Dong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.