Literature DB >> 17426141

Using a self-reported functional score to assess disease progression in systemic sclerosis.

K Serednicka1, A E Smyth, C M Black, C P Denton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study compares the scleroderma Functional Score (FS) with the validated Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI) and other outcome measures. The aim is to determine if the FS is useful as an objective assessment tool for longitudinal evaluation of the functional impact of systemic sclerosis (SSc).
METHODS: A cohort of 135 patients was studied (M:F, 15:120), with a mean age of 45.7 (S.D. = 13.2) at SSc disease onset. 69 (51%) had diffuse cutaneous scleroderma (dcSSc) and 66 (49%) had limited disease (lcSSc). The mean interval between the two assessments was 1.8 yrs (S.D. = 1.2). Functional impact was determined by evaluating archived self-reported questionnaires (FS, HAQ and scleroderma-VAS). Concurrent evaluation of the disease severity score was derived from clinical data stored in the hospital database and from medical case note reviews.
RESULTS: At baseline, the mean FS was 11.0 (S.D. = 9.0) and at reassessment 12.0 (S.D. = 9.2). The mean absolute change in FS between the two assessments was 4.1 (S.D. = 4.9). With time 49% (n = 66) showed a clinically significant change in their functional ability with regard to FS, of these 29% (n = 39) worsened and 20% (n = 27) improved. There was an excellent cross-sectional correlation between the FS and the HAQ-DI (rho = 0.90; P < 0.0001). Also, a strong correlation between longitudinal change in these two outcome measures (rho = 0.59, P < 0.0001) was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first longitudinal study of the scleroderma FS. It demonstrates that the FS can capture bidirectional and clinically significant changes in SSc related disability over time. The concurrent validity of the FS is asserted through its strong correlation with the HAQ-DI. The FS is a disease-specific, inexpensive and practical instrument for assessing functional status in SSc. It is a promising self-administered assessment tool for use in evaluating new SSc treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17426141     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  4 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Gábor Kumánovics; Márta Péntek; Sangmee Bae; Daniela Opris; Dinesh Khanna; Daniel E Furst; László Czirják
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 2.  Functional disability and other health-related quality-of-life domains: points to consider for clinical trials in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Ron D Hays; Daniel E Furst
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 7.580

3.  Long-term effects of bosentan on quality of life, survival, safety and tolerability in pulmonary arterial hypertension related to connective tissue diseases.

Authors:  C P Denton; J E Pope; H-H Peter; A Gabrielli; A Boonstra; F H J van den Hoogen; G Riemekasten; S De Vita; A Morganti; M Dölberg; O Berkani; L Guillevin
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Treatment of diffuse systemic sclerosis with hyperimmune caprine serum (AIMSPRO): a phase II double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  N P Quillinan; D McIntosh; J Vernes; S Haq; C P Denton
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 19.103

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.