| Literature DB >> 1742366 |
Abstract
Lim and Spirin [25] proposed a preferable conformation of the nascent peptide during the ribosomal transpeptidation. Spirin and Lim [26] excluded the possibilities of the side-by-side model proposed by Johnson et al [13] and the three-tRNA binding model (A, P and E sites) of Rheinberger and Nierhaus [3]. However, a slight conformational change at the 3' end regions of both A and P site tRNA molecules can enable the three different tRNA binding models to converge. With a modification of the angles of the ribose rings of both anticodon and mRNA this model can also be related to the model of Sundaralingam et al [19]. In this model of E coli rRNA the 3' end sequence ACCA76 or GCCA76 of P site tRNA is base-paired to UGGU810 of 23S rRNA, while the ACC75 or GCC75 of A site tRNA are base-paired to GGU1621 23S rRNA. The conformation of the A76 of A site tRNA is necessarily different from that of P site tRNA, at least during the course of the transpeptidation. The A76 of A site tRNA overlaps the binding region of puromycin. The C1400 of 16S rRNA in this model is located at a distance of 4 A from the 5' end of the anticodon of P site tRNA [14] and 17 A from the 5' end of the anticodon of A site tRNA [15]. It is also shown that a considerable but reasonable modification in the conformation of the anticodon loops could lead to accommodation of three deacylated tRNA(Phe) molecules at a time on 70S ribosome in the presence of poly(U) as observed experimentally [6]. A sterochemical explanation for the negatively-linked allosteric interactions between the A and E sites is also shown in the present model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1991 PMID: 1742366 DOI: 10.1016/0300-9084(91)90136-o
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochimie ISSN: 0300-9084 Impact factor: 4.079