Literature DB >> 17420944

Applying data mining techniques in the development of a diagnostics questionnaire for GERD.

Noya Horowitz1, Menachem Moshkowitz, Zamir Halpern, Moshe Leshno.   

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition, managed mostly in primary care practice. Heartburn and acid regurgitation are considered primary symptoms, and are usually highly specific. However, the symptom spectrum is much wider and in many cases it is difficult to determine whether the patient has GERD or dyspepsia from another origin. The aim of this study is to develop a symptom score and rule for the diagnosis of GERD, using data mining techniques, to provide a clinical diagnostic tool for primary care practitioners in the evaluation and management of upper gastrointestinal symptoms. A diagnostic symptom questionnaire consisting of 15 items and based on the current literature was designed to measure the presence and severity of reflux and dyspepsia symptoms using a 5-point Likert-type scale. A total of 132 subjects with uninvestigated upper abdominal symptoms were prospectively recruited for symptom evaluation. All patients were interviewed and examined, underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and completed the questionnaire. Based on endoscopic findings as well as the medical interview, the subjects were classified as having reflux disease (GERD) or non-reflux disease (non-GERD). Data mining models and algorithms (neural networks, decision trees, and logistic regression) were used to build a short and simple new discriminative questionnaire. The most relevant variables discriminating GERD from non-GERD patients were heartburn, regurgitation, clinical response to antacids, sour taste, and aggravation of symptoms after a heavy meal. The sensitivity and specificity of the new symptom score were 70%-75% and 63%-78%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve for logistic regression and neural networks were 0.783 and 0.787, respectively. We present a new validated discriminative GERD questionnaire using data mining techniques. The questionnaire is useful, friendly, and short, and therefore can be easily applied in clinical practice for choosing the appropriate diagnostic workup for patients with upper gastrointestinal complaints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17420944     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-006-9202-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.487


  36 in total

1.  Initial validation of a diagnostic questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  M J Shaw; N J Talley; T J Beebe; T Rockwood; R Carlsson; S Adlis; A M Fendrick; R Jones; J Dent; P Bytzer
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials.

Authors:  M Rothman; C Farup; W Stewart; L Helbers; J Zeldis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  The Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score--a tool for the global measurement of dyspepsia.

Authors:  E M el-Omar; S Banerjee; A Wirz; K E McColl
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.566

4.  Initial validation of a bowel symptom questionnaire and measurement of chronic gastrointestinal symptoms in Australians.

Authors:  N J Talley; P M Boyce; B K Owen; P Newman; K J Paterson
Journal:  Aust N Z J Med       Date:  1995-08

5.  A patient questionnaire to identify bowel disease.

Authors:  N J Talley; S F Phillips; J Melton; C Wiltgen; A R Zinsmeister
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  The usefulness of a structured questionnaire in the assessment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  R Carlsson; J Dent; E Bolling-Sternevald; F Johnsson; O Junghard; K Lauritsen; S Riley; L Lundell
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Lack of discriminant value of dyspepsia subgroups in patients referred for upper endoscopy.

Authors:  N J Talley; A L Weaver; D L Tesmer; A R Zinsmeister
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Discriminant value of dyspeptic symptoms: a study of the clinical presentation of 221 patients with dyspepsia of unknown cause, peptic ulceration, and cholelithiasis.

Authors:  N J Talley; D McNeil; D W Piper
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  Recognizing atypical manifestations of GERD. Asthma, chest pain, and otolaryngologic disorders may be due to reflux.

Authors:  V R Mujica; S S Rao
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 10.  Unsolved problems in the management of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  V Stanghellini; R Cogliandro; L Cogliandro; R De Giorgio; G Barbara; R Corinaldesi
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.088

View more
  6 in total

1.  Artificial intelligence techniques applied to the development of a decision-support system for diagnosing celiac disease.

Authors:  Josceli Maria Tenório; Anderson Diniz Hummel; Frederico Molina Cohrs; Vera Lucia Sdepanian; Ivan Torres Pisa; Heimar de Fátima Marin
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 2.  Overlap of functional dyspepsia and GERD--diagnostic and treatment implications.

Authors:  Eamonn M M Quigley; Brian E Lacy
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Use of computerized algorithm to identify individuals in need of testing for celiac disease.

Authors:  Jonas F Ludvigsson; Jyotishman Pathak; Sean Murphy; Matthew Durski; Phillip S Kirsch; Christophe G Chute; Euijung Ryu; Joseph A Murray
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Patient's Experience in Pediatric Primary Immunodeficiency Disorders: Computerized Classification of Questionnaires.

Authors:  Urs Mücke; Christian Klemann; Ulrich Baumann; Almut Meyer-Bahlburg; Xiaowei Kortum; Frank Klawonn; Werner M Lechner; Lorenz Grigull
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Systematic review with meta-analysis: artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of oesophageal diseases.

Authors:  Pierfrancesco Visaggi; Brigida Barberio; Dario Gregori; Danila Azzolina; Matteo Martinato; Cesare Hassan; Prateek Sharma; Edoardo Savarino; Nicola de Bortoli
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 9.524

6.  Heartburn or angina? Differentiating gastrointestinal disease in primary care patients presenting with chest pain: a cross sectional diagnostic study.

Authors:  Stefan Bösner; Jörg Haasenritter; Annette Becker; Maren A Hani; Heidi Keller; Andreas C Sönnichsen; Konstantinos Karatolios; Juergen R Schaefer; Erika Baum; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2009-12-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.