Literature DB >> 17420200

Effect of two work practice changes on the microbial contamination rates of pharmacy-compounded sterile preparations.

Lawrence A Trissel1, Joseph A Gentempo, Lisa M Saenz, Monica Y Woodard, Carol H Angeles.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Using a multiple-step testing medium-risk-level compounding test procedure, the evaluation of two work-practice changes to determine if the changes could effectively reduce the potential for contamination occurrence was conducted.
SUMMARY: Along with training and evaluation of aseptic sterile compounding techniques, each individual pharmacist and pharmacy technician at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center must successfully demonstrate aseptic preparation competency annually by performing the complicated multistep aseptic transfers of growth medium with no resulting growth of microorganisms. The multistep aseptic transfers are designed to simulate manual compounding of the most complicated medium-risk-level preparations anticipated as specified in the United States Pharmacopeia's chapter 797. An evaluation of two modest and simple work-practice changes was conducted: The use of bare hands and nonsterile gloves with only initial disinfection with 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) during years 1 and 2 (group A) was compared with the use of nonsterile chemotherapy gloves with initial and repeated disinfection with IPA for year 3 (group B) and the use of sterile gloves with initial and repeated disinfection with IPA for year 4 (group C). The process involved multiple discrete manipulations, including reconstitution of dry-growth medium; transfers of growth medium from vials and ampules using syringes, needles, a dispensing pin, and a filter straw; and transfers to an empty plastic i.v. bag. For groups B and C, significant reductions in contaminated samples were found compared with group A.
CONCLUSION: The use of protective chemotherapy gloves that were repeatedly disinfected with IPA decreased the contamination rate of pharmacy-compounded sterile preparations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17420200     DOI: 10.2146/060199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  7 in total

1.  Estimated cost savings from reducing errors in the preparation of sterile doses of medications.

Authors:  Terry F Urbine; Philip J Schneider
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-09

2.  Economic and microbiologic evaluation of single-dose vial extension for hazardous drugs.

Authors:  Erinn C Rowe; Scott W Savage; William A Rutala; David J Weber; Maria Gergen-Teague; Stephen F Eckel
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Bacteriological Evaluation of Antiseptic Solutions Used to Keep Cheattle's Forceps.

Authors:  Pawan Agarwal; Mahendra Singh; D Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of microbial contamination of parenteral medication prepared in a clinical versus pharmacy environment.

Authors:  Karin H M Larmené-Beld; Henderik W Frijlink; Katja Taxis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Comparison of Aseptic Compounding Errors Before and After Modified Laboratory and Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experiences.

Authors:  Vincent C Dennis; Arthur H Owora; Alice E Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-12-25       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 6.  Review of studies examining microbial contamination of vials used for preparations done with closed-system drug transfer devices.

Authors:  Annaelle Soubieux; Cynthia Tanguay; Jean-François Bussières
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2019-05-15

7.  Reducing the risk of non-sterility of aseptic handling in hospital pharmacies, part A: risk assessment.

Authors:  Frits A Boom; Judith M Ris; Tjitske Veenbaas; Paul P H Le Brun; Daan Touw
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2020-05-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.