Literature DB >> 17419061

Assessment of foot impairment in rheumatoid arthritis patients by dynamic pedobarography.

Andreas Schmiegel1, Dieter Rosenbaum, Annette Schorat, Arvid Hilker, Markus Gaubitz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Impaired foot function may jeopardize the mobility of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there are still no guidelines concerning the adequate early treatment of painful rheumatoid feet which do not yet require surgery. An assessment method for RA feet appears necessary in order to detect foot problems before functional limitations develop. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of pedobarographic measurements for detecting changes in plantar loading characteristics and their relationship to foot pain in patients with RA.
METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients with RA (55.0+/-11.0 years of age) were divided into three groups according to their Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score and compared to a control group of 20 healthy adults (CG). Thirty-six patients with good physical capacity belonged to group 1 (RA1; HAQ-score: 0-1.0), 38 patients with moderate capacity to group 2 (RA2; score: 1.1-2.0) and 38 patients with low capacity to group 3 (RA3; score: 2.1-3.0). Each patient's foot pain was clinically assessed. Pedobarography was used to analyze foot loading parameters while walking barefoot.
RESULTS: In the forefoot, average pressures under the lateral forefoot were higher in RA1 patients than in RA2 patients and controls (p<0.05) despite an inconspicuous clinical examination of the foot in RA1 patients. RA1 patients also demonstrated higher plantar pressures than RA2 under the second metatarsal head (p<0.05). In contrast, no significant differences in maximum force could be demonstrated between patient groups. Furthermore, in RA3 patients with lower physical capacity, foot pain was increased as compared to RA1 and RA2 patients.
CONCLUSION: In RA patients, pedobarographic patterns show specific changes which characterize the level of functional capacity. In patients with foot involvement, pedobarographic measurements can be useful during the earlier stages of the disease, when clinical examination does not yet indicate the need for more aggressive treatment or orthopedic interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17419061     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  9 in total

1.  Are Pressure Time Integral and Cumulative Plantar Stress Related to First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Pain? Results From a Community-Based Study.

Authors:  Smita Rao; K Douglas Gross; Jingbo Niu; Michael C Nevitt; Cora E Lewis; James C Torner; Jean Hietpas; David Felson; Howard J Hillstrom
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 2.  Musculoskeletal conditions of the foot and ankle: assessments and treatment options.

Authors:  Smita Rao; Jody L Riskowski; Marian T Hannan
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.098

3.  Forefoot pathology in rheumatoid arthritis identified with ultrasound may not localise to areas of highest pressure: cohort observations at baseline and twelve months.

Authors:  David Culliford; Ruth Allen; James Beacroft; Lindsey Hooper; Jane Burridge; Christopher J Edwards; Nigel K Arden; Catherine J Bowen; Anita Gay
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Anatomical location of erosions at the metatarsophalangeal joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Heidi J Siddle; Elizabeth M A Hensor; Richard J Hodgson; Andrew J Grainger; Anthony C Redmond; Richard J Wakefield; Philip S Helliwell
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 5.  Gait characteristics associated with the foot and ankle in inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Carroll; Priya Parmar; Nicola Dalbeth; Mark Boocock; Keith Rome
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  A review of the foot function index and the foot function index - revised.

Authors:  Elly Budiman-Mak; Kendon J Conrad; Jessica Mazza; Rodney M Stuck
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Effects of Ankle Arthrodesis on Biomechanical Performance of the Entire Foot.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Zengyong Li; Duo Wai-Chi Wong; Ming Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Facilitating the interpretation of pedobarography: the relative midfoot index as marker for pathologic gait in ankle osteoarthritic and contralateral feet.

Authors:  Frigg Arno; Frigg Roman; Wiewiorski Martin; Goldoni Jennifer; Horisberger Monika
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis affect the biomechanics of the inner foot differently.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Duo Wai-Chi Wong; Qitao Tan; Zengyong Li; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.