Literature DB >> 17418934

Evaluating sustainable forest management strategies with the Analytic Network Process in a Pressure-State-Response framework.

Bernhard Wolfslehner1, Harald Vacik.   

Abstract

Nowadays forestry faces a complex management situation; the understanding of sustainable forest management (SFM) has gone far beyond the original meaning of sustainable yield of timber. SFM strategies should fulfil ecological, economic and social functions without causing damage to other ecosystems. In this understanding, forest management actions cannot be seen as isolated or mono-causal. In this case study, indicators for SFM are arranged in a Pressure-State-Response (PSR) framework at forest management unit level. This framework links pressures on the environment caused by human activities with changes of environmental state (condition) parameters. Forest management also responds to these changes by instituting environmental and economic measures to reduce pressures and restore natural resources. The Analytic Network Process (ANP) is utilized to evaluate the performance of four management strategies with regard to the PSR framework on SFM. Priorities of indicators and alternatives are modelled with the ANP resulting from the interconnections to other indicators and their respective cumulative importance. The approach allows for more detailed information on the network of human influences and their impacts on forest ecosystems and goes beyond the limitations of flat-dimensioned indicator sets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17418934     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  11 in total

1.  Three-dimensional framework of vigor, organization, and resilience (VOR) for assessing rangeland health: a case study from the alpine meadow of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China.

Authors:  Yuan-yuan Li; Shi-kui Dong; Lu Wen; Xue-xia Wang; Yu Wu
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.184

2.  How can we make progress with decision support systems in landscape and river basin management? Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of four different decision support systems.

Authors:  Martin Volk; Sven Lautenbach; Hedwig van Delden; Lachlan T H Newham; Ralf Seppelt
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  How to support forest management in a world of change: results of some regional studies.

Authors:  C Fürst; C Lorz; H Vacik; N Potocic; F Makeschin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Harnessing ecosystem models and multi-criteria decision analysis for the support of forest management.

Authors:  Bernhard Wolfslehner; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Reviewing the Use of Resilience Concepts in Forest Sciences.

Authors:  L Nikinmaa; M Lindner; E Cantarello; A S Jump; R Seidl; G Winkel; B Muys
Journal:  Curr For Rep       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 10.975

6.  GIS analysis of changes in ecological vulnerability using a SPCA model in the Loess plateau of Northern Shaanxi, China.

Authors:  Kang Hou; Xuxiang Li; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Ecosystem Health Assessment at County-Scale Using the Pressure-State-Response Framework on the Loess Plateau, China.

Authors:  Delin Liu; Shilong Hao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Legume Plants Enhance the Resistance of Soil to Ecosystem Disturbance.

Authors:  Dandan Gao; Xiaoling Wang; Shenglei Fu; Jie Zhao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Spatial-Temporal Coupling Analysis of the Coordination between Urbanization and Water Ecosystem in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.

Authors:  Han Han; Huimin Li; Kaize Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Water Resources Carrying Capacity Evaluation and Diagnosis Based on Set Pair Analysis and Improved the Entropy Weight Method.

Authors:  Yi Cui; Ping Feng; Juliang Jin; Li Liu
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.524

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.