Literature DB >> 17418827

Update on the comparison of assisted reproduction outcomes between Europe and the USA: the 2002 data.

Norbert Gleicher1, Andrea Weghofer, David Barad.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In follow-up to an earlier study of in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in Europe and the U.S. for the year 2001, the present study reports on 2002 outcomes in an attempt to determine diverging practice trends.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort comparisons.
SETTING: Academically affiliated private fertility center. PATIENT(S): This study involved overall 324,238 IVF cycles in Europe and 115,538 cycles in the U.S. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy and delivery rates for fresh IVF cycles, frozen-thawed cycles, and oocyte donation cycles. RESULT(S): This study confirms continuing pregnancy outcome differences in all aspects of assisted reproduction to the benefit of the U.S., a much higher use of IVF procedures in Europe, and larger embryo transfer numbers and multiple pregnancy rates in the U.S., although both continents demonstrate an almost identical trend toward fewer embryos and lower multiple pregnancy rates. CONCLUSION(S): Universally lower pregnancy rates in Europe remain of concern, especially because the trend between 2001 and 2002 suggests a possible further widening of the gap. Initiatives that may further reduce European pregnancy rates, such as increasing emphasis on single-embryo transfers and legislative interventions, should therefore be introduced with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17418827     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  7 in total

1.  Is surgical repair of the fallopian tubes ever appropriate?

Authors:  Ginter Sotrel
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

2.  The effect of progesterone level prior to oocyte retrieval on the numbers of oocytes retrieved and embryo quality in IVF treatment cycles: an analysis of 2,978 cycles.

Authors:  Haiyan Zhu; Liu Liu; Lingyun Yang; Yamei Xue; Xiaomei Tong; Lingying Jiang; Songying Zhang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Enhancing pregnant, donor oocyte recipient women's health in the infertility clinic and beyond: a phenomenological investigation of caring behaviour.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Karen Kavanaugh
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 4.  Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; David H Barad; David F Albertini; Sarah K Darmon; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Worldwide decline of IVF birth rates and its probable causes.

Authors:  N Gleicher; V A Kushnir; D H Barad
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2019-08-08

6.  A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol.

Authors:  P Devroey; R Boostanfar; N P Koper; B M J L Mannaerts; P C Ijzerman-Boon; B C J M Fauser
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  The impact of single versus double blastocyst transfer on pregnancy outcomes: A prospective, randomized control trial.

Authors:  O M Abuzeid; J Deanna; A Abdelaziz; S K Joseph; Y M Abuzeid; W H Salem; M Ashraf; M I Abuzeid
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2017-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.