Literature DB >> 17418256

Biofilm formation in an in vitro model of cochlear implants with removable magnets.

Kimberly A Loeffler1, Trey A Johnson, Robert A Burne, Patrick J Antonelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implant (CI) recesses, such as the removable magnet pocket, appear to harbor more biofilm than smooth surfaces. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of removable magnets on biofilm formation in an in vitro model.
METHODS: Silastic models were constructed to represent CIs with and without a magnet pocket and with and without a titanium blank in the pocket. CIs were exposed to a culture of a biofilm forming strain of Staphylococcus aureus. Adherence of planktonic bacteria and biofilm formation were assessed with quantitative bacterial counts and scanning electron microscopy.
RESULTS: Adherent bacterial counts were significantly higher in CI models with an empty magnet pocket (P = 0.0097). Biofilm formation was significantly lower in CI models without a magnet pocket (P = 0.0121).
CONCLUSIONS: CI magnet pockets harbor bacteria that can increase biofilm development in an in vitro model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17418256     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  8 in total

Review 1.  Surgery of the ear and the lateral skull base: pitfalls and complications.

Authors:  Bernhard Schick; Julia Dlugaiczyk
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

2.  Postoperative complications in cochlear implants: a retrospective analysis of 438 consecutive cases.

Authors:  A Ciorba; R Bovo; P Trevisi; M Rosignoli; C Aimoni; A Castiglione; A Martini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Surface charge modification decreases Pseudomonas aeruginosa adherence in vitro and bacterial persistence in an in vivo implant model.

Authors:  W Katherine Kao; Patricia M Gagnon; Joseph P Vogel; Richard A Chole
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Immuno-detection of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm on a cochlear implant.

Authors:  M I Kos; L Stenz; P François; J-P Guyot; J Schrenzel
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  Analysis of Bacterial Biofilms on a Cochlear Implant Following Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infection.

Authors:  Gi Jung Im; Yun Suk An; June Choi; Jae Jun Song; Sung Won Chae; Hak Hyun Jung
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2015-12-18

6.  Heat transfer analysis in an uncoiled model of the cochlea during magnetic cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Fateme Esmailie; Mathieu Francoeur; Tim Ameel
Journal:  Int J Heat Mass Transf       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.584

7.  Biomaterials in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Timo Stöver; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

8.  Skin Flap Necrosis by Bone Marking with Methylene Blue in Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Yeon Hoo Kim; Sung Il Cho
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2015-09-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.