Literature DB >> 17418194

Service user views and expectations of UK-registered mental health nurses: a systematic review of empirical research.

Penny Bee1, John Playle, Karina Lovell, Pamela Barnes, Richard Gray, Philip Keeley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review national (UK) literature in order to (i) examine service user and carer views of UK-registered mental health nurses; (ii) identify the diversity of populations from which these views have been collected; (iii) assess the methodological rigour of the current knowledge base and (iv) evaluate the extent to which service users and carers have been involved in the development and execution of this work. This paper reports only on service users' views.
DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Electronic and evidence-based databases, reference checking and hand searching of key academic journals, national policy and user/carer organisational websites. REVIEW
METHODS: Two reviewers independently undertook study eligibility judgements and data extraction. Eligible studies were sub-classified according to service setting (inpatient/residential, community/non-residential or mixed/unspecified). Each study was assessed against key quality criteria. Data were synthesised in a narrative format.
RESULTS: One hundred and thirty two studies were included in the review. The majority were small-scale academic studies biased towards white, adult service users. Few studies provided evidence of user collaboration. Service users regard mental health nursing as a multi-faceted role delivering practical and social support alongside more formal psychological therapies. Service users report inadequate information provision, poor inter-professional communication and a lack of opportunities for collaborative care. Service users perceive inpatient mental health nurses as particularly inaccessible.
CONCLUSIONS: UK-registered mental health nurses should be equipped with both therapeutic clinical skills and generic skills associated with relationship building, engagement and communication. Future research should be conducted in collaboration with service users and include clear and effective mechanisms for the dissemination and implementation of research findings. In particular, the views of children and adolescents, the elderly and black and minority ethnic groups, currently under-represented in research, should be examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17418194     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  26 in total

1.  The needs of primary care mental health service users: a Q-sort study.

Authors:  Mark Papworth; Leonie Walker
Journal:  Ment Health Fam Med       Date:  2008-12

Review 2.  Information and decision-making needs among people with mental disorders: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lisa Tlach; Caroline Wüsten; Anne Daubmann; Sarah Liebherz; Martin Härter; Jörg Dirmaier
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Models of user involvement in the mental health context: intentions and implementation challenges.

Authors:  Marianne Storm; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2013-09

Review 4.  Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why? A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map.

Authors:  Vikki Entwistle; Danielle Firnigl; Mandy Ryan; Jillian Francis; Philip Kinghorn
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2011-10-03

5.  Re-inventing care planning in mental health: stakeholder accounts of the imagined implementation of a user/carer involved intervention.

Authors:  Helen Brooks; Caroline Sanders; Karina Lovell; Claire Fraser; Anne Rogers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  Service user- and carer-reported measures of involvement in mental health care planning: methodological quality and acceptability to users.

Authors:  Chris J Gibbons; Penny E Bee; Lauren Walker; Owen Price; Karina Lovell
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 7.  Systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to service user-led care planning.

Authors:  Penny Bee; Owen Price; John Baker; Karina Lovell
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  Carers' experiences of involvement in care planning: a qualitative exploration of the facilitators and barriers to engagement with mental health services.

Authors:  Lindsey Cree; Helen L Brooks; Kathryn Berzins; Claire Fraser; Karina Lovell; Penny Bee
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  Professional perspectives on service user and carer involvement in mental health care planning: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Penny Bee; Helen Brooks; Claire Fraser; Karina Lovell
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 5.837

10.  A cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation of a training programme for mental health professionals to enhance user involvement in care planning in service users with severe mental health issues (EQUIP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Peter Bower; Chris Roberts; Neil O'Leary; Patrick Callaghan; Penny Bee; Claire Fraser; Chris Gibbons; Nicola Olleveant; Anne Rogers; Linda Davies; Richard Drake; Caroline Sanders; Oonagh Meade; Andrew Grundy; Lauren Walker; Lindsey Cree; Kathryn Berzins; Helen Brooks; Susan Beatty; Patrick Cahoon; Anita Rolfe; Karina Lovell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.