Literature DB >> 17417756

In vitro comparison of two bioartificial liver support systems: MELS CellModule and AMC-BAL.

P P C Poyck1, G Pless, R Hoekstra, S Roth, A C W A Van Wijk, R Schwartländer, T M Van Gulik, I M Sauer, R A F M Chamuleau.   

Abstract

Clinically applied bioartificial liver (BAL) support systems are difficult to compare with regard to overall hepatocyte-specific function and clinical outcome. We compared two clinically applied BAL systems, the Modular Extracorporeal Liver Support (MELS) CellModule and the AMC-bioartificial liver (AMC-BAL) in an in vitro set-up. Both BAL systems were loaded with 10 billion freshly isolated porcine hepatocytes, cultured for 7 days and tested on days 1, 2, 4 and 7. Average decrease in hepatocyte-specific functions over 7 days was 9.7%. Three parameters differed between both bioreactors: lidocaine elimination at days 1 and 2 was significantly higher in the AMCBAL, ammonia elimination showed a significantly higher trend for the AMC-BAL over 7 days and LDH release was significantly lower at day 7 for the MELS CellModule. In conclusion, this first in vitro comparison of two clinically applied BAL systems shows comparable functional capacity over a period of 7 days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17417756     DOI: 10.1177/039139880703000302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Artif Organs        ISSN: 0391-3988            Impact factor:   1.595


  7 in total

1.  Artificial and bioartificial liver support.

Authors:  Gesine Pless
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 2.  Bioreactor technologies to support liver function in vitro.

Authors:  Mohammad R Ebrahimkhani; Jaclyn A Shepard Neiman; Micha Sam B Raredon; David J Hughes; Linda G Griffith
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  Integration of single-layer skin hollow fibers and scaffolds develops a three-dimensional hybrid bioreactor for bioartificial livers.

Authors:  Shichang Zhang; Li Chen; Tao Liu; Zhengguo Wang; Yingjie Wang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Bifunctional polyethersulfone hollow fiber with a porous, single-layer skin for use as a bioartificial liver bioreactor.

Authors:  Shichang Zhang; Tao Liu; Li Chen; Mingliang Ren; Bo Zhang; Zhengguo Wang; Yingjie Wang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Profiling the impact of medium formulation on morphology and functionality of primary hepatocytes in vitro.

Authors:  Leonard J Nelson; Philipp Treskes; A Forbes Howie; Simon W Walker; Peter C Hayes; John N Plevris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Evaluation of encapsulated liver cell spheroids in a fluidised-bed bioartificial liver for treatment of ischaemic acute liver failure in pigs in a translational setting.

Authors:  Clare Selden; Catherine Wendy Spearman; Delawir Kahn; Malcolm Miller; Anthony Figaji; Eloy Erro; James Bundy; Isobel Massie; Sherri-Ann Chalmers; Hiram Arendse; Aude Gautier; Peter Sharratt; Barry Fuller; Humphrey Hodgson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Artificial Liver and Renal Support System for Cynomolgus Monkeys with Surgery-Induced Acute Renal Failure: A Preclinical Study.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Guolin He; Lei Cai; Chaoyi Fu; Yang Li; Jun Weng; Xiaolin Huo; Qing Peng; Yi Gao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.